Primary and Secondary Factor Consistency as Domain Knowledge to Guide Happiness Computing in Online Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Happiness computing based on large-scale online web data and machine learning methods is an emerging research topic that underpins a range of issues, from personal growth to social stability. Many advanced Machine Learning (ML) models with explanations are used to compute the happiness online assessment while maintaining high accuracy of results. However, domain knowledge constraints, such as the primary and secondary relations of happiness factors, are absent from these models, which limits the association between computing results and the right reasons for why they occurred. This article attempts to provide new insights into the explanation consistency from an empirical study perspective. Then we study how to represent and introduce domain knowledge constraints to make ML models more trustworthy. We achieve this through: (1) proving that multiple prediction models with additive factor attributions will have the desirable property of primary and secondary relations consistency, and (2) showing that factor relations with quantity can be represented as an importance distribution for encoding domain knowledge. Factor explanation difference is penalized by the Kullback-Leibler divergence-based loss among computing models. Experimental results using two online web datasets show that domain knowledge of stable factor relations exists. Using this knowledge not only improves happiness computing accuracy but also reveals more significative happiness factors for assisting decisions well.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.
Builds on
16 of 63 references.
References · 16
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2021Deep Stable Learning for Out-Of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 153
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
- 2016Discovering Causal Signals in Imagescited by 79
- 2022Probabilistic Representations for Video Contrastive Learningcited by 33
- 2022Explanation Guided Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendationcited by 11
4 more
- 2018HappyDB: A Corpus of 100,000 Crowdsourced Happy Momentscited by 9
- 2020Does Yoga Make You Happy? Analyzing Twitter User Happiness using Textual and Temporal Informationcited by 4
- 2019Happiness Entailment: Automating Suggestions for Well-Beingcited by 3
- 2019Happy Together: Learning and Understanding Appraisal From Natural Languagecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.