mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring the Limits of Zero Shot Vision Language Models for Hate Meme Detection: The Vulnerabilities and their Interpretations

arXiv 2402.12198 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.CV cs.LGcited by 10

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Social bias and fairness in VLMs

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

There is a rapid increase in the use of multimedia content in current social media platforms. One of the highly popular forms of such multimedia content are memes. While memes have been primarily invented to promote funny and buoyant discussions, malevolent users exploit memes to target individuals or vulnerable communities, making it imperative to identify and address such instances of hateful memes. Thus social media platforms are in dire need for active moderation of such harmful content. While manual moderation is extremely difficult due to the scale of such content, automatic moderation is challenged by the need of good quality annotated data to train hate meme detection algorithms. This makes a perfect pretext for exploring the power of modern day vision language models (VLMs) that have exhibited outstanding performance across various tasks. In this paper we study the effectiveness of VLMs in handling intricate tasks such as hate meme detection in a completely zero-shot setting so that there is no dependency on annotated data for the task. We perform thorough prompt engineering and query state-of-the-art VLMs using various prompt types to detect hateful/harmful memes. We further interpret the misclassification cases using a novel superpixel based occlusion method. Finally we show that these misclassifications can be neatly arranged into a typology of error classes the knowledge of which should enable the design of better safety guardrails in future.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social bias and fairness in VLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  5. 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 485
  6. 2023OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documentscited by 316
  7. 2019Exploring Hate Speech Detection in Multimodal Publicationscited by 103
  8. 2023Prompting for Multimodal Hateful Meme Classificationcited by 68
  9. 2023Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiescited by 52
  10. 2024GOAT-Bench: Safety Insights to Large Multimodal Models through Meme-Based Social Abusecited by 50
  11. 2023Decoding the Underlying Meaning of Multimodal Hateful Memescited by 38
  12. 2023SentimentGPT: Exploiting GPT for Advanced Sentiment Analysis and its Departure from Current Machine Learningcited by 38
9 more
  1. 2021"Subverting the Jewtocracy": Online Antisemitism Detection Using Multimodal Deep Learningcited by 21
  2. 2023Improving Zero-shot Visual Question Answering via Large Language Models with Reasoning Question Promptscited by 19
  3. 2023BanglaAbuseMeme: A Dataset for Bengali Abusive Meme Classificationcited by 18
  4. 2021AOMD: An Analogy-aware Approach to Offensive Meme Detection on Social Mediacited by 13
  5. 2021Memes in the Wild: Assessing the Generalizability of the Hateful Memes Challenge Datasetcited by 13
  6. 2023Detecting and Correcting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes with Large Visual Language Modelcited by 12
  7. 2023Bridging the Transparency Gap: What Can Explainable AI Learn From the AI Act?cited by 10
  8. 2023LICO: Explainable Models with Language-Image Consistencycited by 5
  9. 2021An Interpretable Approach to Hateful Meme Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Detecting and Mitigating Hateful Content in Multimodal Memes with Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Beyond Accuracy: A Qualitative Analysis of Vision-Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Memes
  3. 2023A Review of Vision-Language Models and their Performance on the Hateful Memes Challenge
  4. 2023Pro-Cap: Leveraging a Frozen Vision-Language Model for Hateful Meme Detection
  5. 2026From Native Memes to Global Moderation: Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Vision-Language Models for Hateful Meme Detection
  6. 2025Demystifying Hateful Content: Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for Hateful Meme Detection with Explainable Decisions
  7. 2025Cross-Modal Transfer from Memes to Videos: Addressing Data Scarcity in Hateful Video Detection
  8. 2025Labels or Input? Rethinking Augmentation in Multimodal Hate Detection