mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

IRR: Image Review Ranking Framework for Evaluating Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2402.12121 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) process both images and text, excelling in multimodal tasks such as image captioning and description generation. However, while these models excel at generating factual content, their ability to generate and evaluate texts reflecting perspectives on the same image, depending on the context, has not been sufficiently explored. To address this, we propose IRR: Image Review Rank, a novel evaluation framework designed to assess critic review texts from multiple perspectives. IRR evaluates LVLMs by measuring how closely their judgments align with human interpretations. We validate it using a dataset of images from 15 categories, each with five critic review texts and annotated rankings in both English and Japanese, totaling over 2,000 data instances. The datasets are available at https://hf.co/datasets/naist-nlp/Wiki-ImageReview1.0. Our results indicate that, although LVLMs exhibited consistent performance across languages, their correlation with human annotations was insufficient, highlighting the need for further advancements. These findings highlight the limitations of current evaluation methods and the need for approaches that better capture human reasoning in Vision & Language tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 8 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.

Builds on

8 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug

Other references · 7

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  5. 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,040
  6. 2019KG-BERT: BERT for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 324
  7. 2024Knowledge Graphs Meet Multi-Modal Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023TouchStone: Evaluating Vision-Language Models by Language Models
  2. 2025UPME: An Unsupervised Peer Review Framework for Multimodal Large Language Model Evaluation
  3. 2026Scaling Vision-Language Models Is Not Enough to Mitigate Bias
  4. 2025Multimodal Language Models as Text-to-Image Model Evaluators
  5. 2024AutoBench-V: Can Large Vision-Language Models Benchmark Themselves?
  6. 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models
  7. 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
  8. 2025VISTAR:A User-Centric and Role-Driven Benchmark for Text-to-Image Evaluation