Evaluating the Stability of Deep Learning Latent Feature Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-dimensional datasets present substantial challenges in statistical modeling across various disciplines, necessitating effective dimensionality reduction methods. Deep learning approaches, notable for their capacity to distill essential features from complex data, facilitate modeling, visualization, and compression through reduced dimensionality latent feature spaces, have wide applications from bioinformatics to earth sciences. This study introduces a novel workflow to evaluate the stability of these latent spaces, ensuring consistency and reliability in subsequent analyses. Stability, defined as the invariance of latent spaces to minor data, training realizations, and parameter perturbations, is crucial yet often overlooked. Our proposed methodology delineates three stability types, sample, structural, and inferential, within latent spaces, and introduces a suite of metrics for comprehensive evaluation. We implement this workflow across 500 autoencoder realizations and three datasets, encompassing both synthetic and real-world scenarios to explain latent space dynamics. Employing k-means clustering and the modified Jonker-Volgenant algorithm for class alignment, alongside anisotropy metrics and convex hull analysis, we introduce adjusted stress and Jaccard dissimilarity as novel stability indicators. Our findings highlight inherent instabilities in latent feature spaces and demonstrate the workflow's efficacy in quantifying and interpreting these instabilities. This work advances the understanding of latent feature spaces, promoting improved model interpretability and quality control for more informed decision-making for diverse analytical workflows that leverage deep learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 133 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.
Builds on
12 of 133 references.
References · 12
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 199
- 2020Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualizationcited by 170
- 2014A survey of dimensionality reduction techniquescited by 50
- 2021Data Augmentation with Variational Autoencoders and Manifold Samplingcited by 16
- 20203D CNN-PCA: A Deep-Learning-Based Parameterization for Complex Geomodelscited by 13
- 2019Latent space conditioning for improved classification and anomaly detectioncited by 8
- 2023A Critical Review of Physics-Informed Machine Learning Applications in Subsurface Energy Systemscited by 4
- 2017A New Method for Performance Analysis in Nonlinear Dimensionality Reductioncited by 3
- 2019Data Augmentation by AutoEncoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 3
- 2023Rigid Transformations for Stabilized Lower Dimensional Space to Support Subsurface Uncertainty Quantification and Interpretationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.