mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLM can Achieve Self-Regulation via Hyperparameter Aware Generation

arXiv 2402.11251 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), users commonly employ diverse decoding strategies and adjust hyperparameters to control the generated text. However, a critical question emerges: Are LLMs conscious of the existence of these decoding strategies and capable of regulating themselves? The current decoding generation process often relies on empirical and heuristic manual adjustments to hyperparameters based on types of tasks and demands. However, this process is typically cumbersome, and the decoding hyperparameters may not always be optimal for each sample. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose a novel text generation paradigm termed Hyperparameter Aware Generation (HAG). By leveraging hyperparameter-aware instruction tuning, the LLM autonomously determines the optimal decoding strategy and configs based on the input samples, enabling self-regulation. Our approach eliminates the need for extensive manual tuning, offering a more autonomous, self-regulate model behavior. Experimental results spanning six datasets across reasoning, creativity, translation, and mathematics tasks demonstrate that hyperparameter-aware instruction tuning empowers the LLMs to self-regulate the decoding strategy and hyperparameter. HAG extends the current paradigm in the text generation process, highlighting the feasibility of endowing the LLMs with self-regulate decoding strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  6. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  7. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  8. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  9. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
  10. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  11. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
  12. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 391
10 more
  1. 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 360
  2. 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 287
  3. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 277
  4. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 238
  5. 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representationscited by 205
  6. 2023Self-Edit: Fault-Aware Code Editor for Code Generationcited by 111
  7. 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
  8. 2022Self-Generated In-Context Learning: Leveraging Auto-regressive Language Models as a Demonstration Generatorcited by 68
  9. 2023Cost-Effective Hyperparameter Optimization for Large Language Model Generation Inferencecited by 40
  10. 2023Bounding the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Open Text Generation with Prompt Constraintscited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.