mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

arXiv 2402.10705 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2024cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) is the mainstream framework for solving the Satisfiability problem (SAT), and CDCL solvers typically rely on various heuristics, which have a significant impact on their performance. Modern CDCL solvers, such as MiniSat and Kissat, commonly incorporate several heuristics and select one to use according to simple rules, requiring significant time and expert effort to fine-tune in practice. The pervasion of Large Language Models (LLMs) provides a potential solution to address this issue. However, generating a CDCL solver from scratch is not effective due to the complexity and context volume of SAT solvers. Instead, we propose AutoSAT, a framework that automatically optimizes heuristics in a pre-defined modular search space based on existing CDCL solvers. Unlike existing automated algorithm design approaches focusing on hyperparameter tuning and operator selection, AutoSAT can generate new efficient heuristics. In this first attempt at optimizing SAT solvers using LLMs, several strategies including the greedy hill climber and (1+1) Evolutionary Algorithm are employed to guide LLMs to search for better heuristics. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs can generally enhance the performance of CDCL solvers. A realization of AutoSAT outperforms MiniSat on 9 out of 12 datasets and even surpasses the state-of-the-art hybrid solver Kissat on 4 datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.

Builds on

23 of 54 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  4. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  5. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
  7. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  8. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  9. 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
  10. 2024ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolutioncited by 266
  11. 2024Evolution of Heuristics: Towards Efficient Automatic Algorithm Design Using Large Language Modelcited by 258
  12. 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 250
11 more
  1. 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 198
  2. 2023SwiftSage: A Generative Agent with Fast and Slow Thinking for Complex Interactive Taskscited by 166
  3. 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
  4. 2019Guiding High-Performance SAT Solvers with Unsat-Core Predictionscited by 61
  5. 2023Let the Flows Tell: Solving Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems with GFlowNetscited by 40
  6. 2023Flows: Building Blocks of Reasoning and Collaborating AIcited by 25
  7. 2021NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural Networkscited by 19
  8. 2022NSNet: A General Neural Probabilistic Framework for Satisfiability Problemscited by 18
  9. 2023G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networkscited by 17
  10. 2022Survey on Evolutionary Deep Learning: Principles, Algorithms, Applications and Open Issuescited by 12
  11. 2020Enhancing SAT solvers with glue variable predictionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: