Multi-Excitation Projective Simulation with a Many-Body Physics Inspired Inductive Bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the impressive progress of deep learning, applications relying on machine learning are increasingly being integrated into daily life. However, most deep learning models have an opaque, oracle-like nature making it difficult to interpret and understand their decisions. This problem led to the development of the field known as eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). One method in this field known as Projective Simulation (PS) models a chain-of-thought as a random walk of a particle on a graph with vertices that have concepts attached to them. While this description has various benefits, including the possibility of quantization, it cannot be naturally used to model thoughts that combine several concepts simultaneously. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Multi-Excitation Projective Simulation (mePS), a generalization that considers a chain-of-thought to be a random walk of several particles on a hypergraph. A definition for a dynamic hypergraph is put forward to describe the agent's training history along with applications to AI and hypergraph visualization. An inductive bias inspired by the remarkably successful few-body interaction models used in quantum many-body physics is formalized for our classical mePS framework and employed to tackle the exponential complexity associated with naive implementations of hypergraphs. We prove that our inductive bias reduces the complexity from exponential to polynomial, with the exponent representing the cutoff on how many particles can interact. We numerically apply our method to two toy environments and a more complex scenario modelling the diagnosis of a broken computer. These environments demonstrate the resource savings provided by an appropriate choice of inductive bias, as well as showcasing aspects of interpretability. A quantum model for mePS is also briefly outlined and some future directions for it are discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.
Builds on
28 of 97 references.
References · 28
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2018Hypergraph Neural Networkscited by 488
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 275
- 2021Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 232
- 2023A Survey of Imitation Learning: Algorithms, Recent Developments, and Challengescited by 148
- 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 110
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 91
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61
- 2017Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experimentscited by 41
16 more
- 2021A Survey on Neural-symbolic Learning Systemscited by 39
- 2015A Survey on Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 34
- 2021A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methodscited by 29
- 2023Causal Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 23
- 2019A Review of Modularization Techniques in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2020Medical Deep Learning -- A systematic Meta-Reviewcited by 9
- 2013Projective simulation for classical learning agents: a comprehensive investigationcited by 6
- 2020Visual Analytics for Temporal Hypergraph Model Explorationcited by 6
- 2023Neurosymbolic AI and its Taxonomy: a surveycited by 6
- 2021Towards a Survey on Static and Dynamic Hypergraph Visualizationscited by 5
- 2023Optimal foraging strategies can be learnedcited by 5
- 2023Towards interpretable quantum machine learning via single-photon quantum walkscited by 4
- 2019On the convergence of projective-simulation-based reinforcement learning in Markov decision processescited by 3
- 2020Collective defense of honeybee colonies: experimental results and theoretical modelingcited by 3
- 2023Modularity in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 3
- 2018Benchmarking projective simulation in navigation problemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Physics-inspired Generative AI models via real hardware-based noisy quantum diffusion
- 2026Exploring Structures in Physics Problems: Can AI Agents Discover Statistical Mechanical Mappings?
- 2025Chain of Time: In-Context Physical Simulation with Image Generation Models
- 2024Quantum Many-Body Physics Calculations with Large Language Models
- 2025Wavefunction Flows: Efficient Quantum Simulation of Continuous Flow Models
- 2022Emulating Quantum Dynamics with Neural Networks via Knowledge Distillation
- 2022Quantum-enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo
- 2025QuXAI: Explainers for Hybrid Quantum Machine Learning Models