mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Camouflage is all you need: Evaluating and Enhancing Language Model Robustness Against Camouflage Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2402.09874 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks represent a substantial challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP). This study undertakes a systematic exploration of this challenge in two distinct phases: vulnerability evaluation and resilience enhancement of Transformer-based models under adversarial attacks. In the evaluation phase, we assess the susceptibility of three Transformer configurations, encoder-decoder, encoder-only, and decoder-only setups, to adversarial attacks of escalating complexity across datasets containing offensive language and misinformation. Encoder-only models manifest a 14% and 21% performance drop in offensive language detection and misinformation detection tasks, respectively. Decoder-only models register a 16% decrease in both tasks, while encoder-decoder models exhibit a maximum performance drop of 14% and 26% in the respective tasks. The resilience-enhancement phase employs adversarial training, integrating pre-camouflaged and dynamically altered data. This approach effectively reduces the performance drop in encoder-only models to an average of 5% in offensive language detection and 2% in misinformation detection tasks. Decoder-only models, occasionally exceeding original performance, limit the performance drop to 7% and 2% in the respective tasks. Although not surpassing the original performance, Encoder-decoder models can reduce the drop to an average of 6% and 2% respectively. Results suggest a trade-off between performance and robustness, with some models maintaining similar performance while gaining robustness. Our study and adversarial training techniques have been incorporated into an open-source tool for generating camouflaged datasets. However, methodology effectiveness depends on the specific camouflage technique and data encountered, emphasizing the need for continued exploration.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  6. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  7. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  8. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  9. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  10. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  11. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  12. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
16 more
  1. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  2. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 233
  3. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  4. 2017Deep Text Classification Can be Fooledcited by 105
  5. 2018Seq2Sick: Evaluating the Robustness of Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Adversarial Examplescited by 93
  6. 2020Fighting an Infodemic: COVID-19 Fake News Datasetcited by 82
  7. 2020An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Modelscited by 67
  8. 2019On Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbations for Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 56
  9. 2018Comparing Attention-based Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks: Success and Limitations in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 19
  10. 2021The NLP Cookbook: Modern Recipes for Transformer based Deep Learning Architecturescited by 16
  11. 2019White-to-Black: Efficient Distillation of Black-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  12. 2021FacTeR-Check: Semi-automated fact-checking through Semantic Similarity and Natural Language Inferencecited by 10
  13. 2021Studying Fake News Spreading, Polarisation Dynamics, and Manipulation by Bots: a Tale of Networks and Languagecited by 6
  14. 2020A Context Aware Approach for Generating Natural Language Attackscited by 5
  15. 2022Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflagecited by 4
  16. 2021Adversarial attacks on voter model dynamics in complex networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.