Exploring the Adversarial Capabilities of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has sparked widespread and general interest due to their strong language generation capabilities, offering great potential for both industry and research. While previous research delved into the security and privacy issues of LLMs, the extent to which these models can exhibit adversarial behavior remains largely unexplored. Addressing this gap, we investigate whether common publicly available LLMs have inherent capabilities to perturb text samples to fool safety measures, so-called adversarial examples resp.~attacks. More specifically, we investigate whether LLMs are inherently able to craft adversarial examples out of benign samples to fool existing safe rails. Our experiments, which focus on hate speech detection, reveal that LLMs succeed in finding adversarial perturbations, effectively undermining hate speech detection systems. Our findings carry significant implications for (semi-)autonomous systems relying on LLMs, highlighting potential challenges in their interaction with existing systems and safety measures.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2024.
Builds on
18 of 21 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
6 more
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 439
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
- 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 250
- 2020Deep Learning Models for Multilingual Hate Speech Detectioncited by 49
- 2021Learning to Break Deep Perceptual Hashing: The Use Case NeuralHashcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 215
- 2024BlueSuffix: Reinforced Blue Teaming for Vision-Language Models Against Jailbreak Attackscited by 28
- 2025Convergence dynamics of Agent-to-Agent Interactions with Misaligned objectivescited by 1
- 2026Truth Lies Deep: Countering Semantic Camouflage via Latent Intent Verificationcited by 0
- 2026Truth Lies Deep: Countering Semantic Camouflage via Latent Intent Verification27 Jun 2026
- 2025Convergence dynamics of Agent-to-Agent Interactions with Misaligned objectives11 Nov 2025
- 2024BlueSuffix: Reinforced Blue Teaming for Vision-Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks28 Oct 2024
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey5 Jul 2024