Provable Traffic Rule Compliance in Safe Reinforcement Learning on the Open Sea
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For safe operation, autonomous vehicles have to obey traffic rules that are set forth in legal documents formulated in natural language. Temporal logic is a suitable concept to formalize such traffic rules. Still, temporal logic rules often result in constraints that are hard to solve using optimization-based motion planners. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising method to find motion plans for autonomous vehicles. However, vanilla RL algorithms are based on random exploration and do not automatically comply with traffic rules. Our approach accomplishes guaranteed rule-compliance by integrating temporal logic specifications into RL. Specifically, we consider the application of vessels on the open sea, which must adhere to the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS). To efficiently synthesize rule-compliant actions, we combine predicates based on set-based prediction with a statechart representing our formalized rules and their priorities. Action masking then restricts the RL agent to this set of verified rule-compliant actions. In numerical evaluations on critical maritime traffic situations, our agent always complies with the formalized legal rules and never collides while achieving a high goal-reaching rate during training and deployment. In contrast, vanilla and traffic rule-informed RL agents frequently violate traffic rules and collide even after training.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2024.
Builds on
17 of 80 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2019Liability, Ethics, and Culture-Aware Behavior Specification using Rulebookscited by 41
- 2022Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarkingcited by 31
- 2018Simulation-based Adversarial Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Machine Learning Componentscited by 28
- 2022Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning via Action Projection using Reachability Analysis and Polynomial Zonotopescited by 23
- 2021Computationally Efficient Safe Reinforcement Learning for Power Systemscited by 17
- 2019Verifiably Safe Off-Model Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020COLREG-Compliant Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Surface Vehicle using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020Formalizing Traffic Rules for Machine Interpretabilitycited by 12
- 2021A Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Motion Planning and Control of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 10
5 more
- 2021Risk-based implementation of COLREGs for autonomous surface vehicles using deep reinforcement learningcited by 7
- 2022Fully-Automated Verification of Linear Systems Using Inner- and Outer-Approximations of Reachable Setscited by 4
- 2019The Branching-Course MPC Algorithm for Maritime Collision Avoidancecited by 2
- 2021COLREGs-Informed RRT* for Collision Avoidance of Marine Craftscited by 2
- 2022A Survey of Recent Machine Learning Solutions for Ship Collision Avoidance and Mission Planningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.