mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Universal Link Predictor By In-Context Learning on Graphs

arXiv 2402.07738 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Link prediction is a crucial task in graph machine learning, where the goal is to infer missing or future links within a graph. Traditional approaches leverage heuristic methods based on widely observed connectivity patterns, offering broad applicability and generalizability without the need for model training. Despite their utility, these methods are limited by their reliance on human-derived heuristics and lack the adaptability of data-driven approaches. Conversely, parametric link predictors excel in automatically learning the connectivity patterns from data and achieving state-of-the-art but fail short to directly transfer across different graphs. Instead, it requires the cost of extensive training and hyperparameter optimization to adapt to the target graph. In this work, we introduce the Universal Link Predictor (UniLP), a novel model that combines the generalizability of heuristic approaches with the pattern learning capabilities of parametric models. UniLP is designed to autonomously identify connectivity patterns across diverse graphs, ready for immediate application to any unseen graph dataset without targeted training. We address the challenge of conflicting connectivity patterns-arising from the unique distributions of different graphs-through the implementation of In-context Learning (ICL). This approach allows UniLP to dynamically adjust to various target graphs based on contextual demonstrations, thereby avoiding negative transfer. Through rigorous experimentation, we demonstrate UniLP's effectiveness in adapting to new, unseen graphs at test time, showcasing its ability to perform comparably or even outperform parametric models that have been finetuned for specific datasets. Our findings highlight UniLP's potential to set a new standard in link prediction, combining the strengths of heuristic and parametric methods in a single, versatile framework.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

40 of 70 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  6. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  7. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  8. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  9. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  10. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  11. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  12. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
28 more
  1. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  2. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
  3. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
  4. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
  5. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  6. 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 543
  7. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 422
  8. 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 386
  9. 2019Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph Reasoningcited by 237
  10. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235
  11. 2022Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizerscited by 204
  12. 2023What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learningcited by 149
  13. 2020Labeling Trick: A Theory of Using Graph Neural Networks for Multi-Node Representation Learningcited by 148
  14. 2022Understanding and Extending Subgraph GNNs by Rethinking Their Symmetriescited by 112
  15. 2023PRODIGY: Enabling In-context Learning Over Graphscited by 97
  16. 2022Decoupling the Depth and Scope of Graph Neural Networkscited by 94
  17. 2022Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction with Subgraph Sketchingcited by 81
  18. 2021AFEC: Active Forgetting of Negative Transfer in Continual Learningcited by 73
  19. 2023Neural Common Neighbor with Completion for Link Predictioncited by 64
  20. 2020Inductive Entity Representations from Text via Link Predictioncited by 61
  21. 2022The Dual Form of Neural Networks Revisited: Connecting Test Time Predictions to Training Patterns via Spotlights of Attentioncited by 45
  22. 2022Linkless Link Prediction via Relational Distillationcited by 39
  23. 2019Stacking Models for Nearly Optimal Link Prediction in Complex Networkscited by 35
  24. 2015Evaluating Link Prediction Methodscited by 31
  25. 2023Revisiting Link Prediction: A Data Perspectivecited by 29
  26. 2023Pure Message Passing Can Estimate Common Neighbor for Link Predictioncited by 18
  27. 2020Self-Supervised Learning of Contextual Embeddings for Link Prediction in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 17
  28. 2022FakeEdge: Alleviate Dataset Shift in Link Predictioncited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

12 papers.