mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Identifying architectural design decisions for achieving green ML serving

arXiv 2402.07585 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.SEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing use of large machine learning models highlights concerns about their increasing computational demands. While the energy consumption of their training phase has received attention, fewer works have considered the inference phase. For ML inference, the binding of ML models to the ML system for user access, known as ML serving, is a critical yet understudied step for achieving efficiency in ML applications. We examine the literature in ML architectural design decisions and Green AI, with a special focus on ML serving. The aim is to analyze ML serving architectural design decisions for the purpose of understanding and identifying them with respect to quality characteristics from the point of view of researchers and practitioners in the context of ML serving literature. Our results (i) identify ML serving architectural design decisions along with their corresponding components and associated technological stack, and (ii) provide an overview of the quality characteristics studied in the literature, including energy efficiency. This preliminary study is the first step in our goal to achieve green ML serving. Our analysis may aid ML researchers and practitioners in making green-aware architecture design decisions when serving their models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  3. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  4. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 195
  5. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
  6. 2021Compute and Energy Consumption Trends in Deep Learning Inferencecited by 61
  7. 2019pCAMP: Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Packages on the Edgescited by 12
  8. 2023Batching for Green AI -- An Exploratory Study on Inferencecited by 4
  9. 2014A Review of Software Quality Models for the Evaluation of Software Productscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.