Topological safeguard for evasion attack interpreting the neural networks' behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the last years, Deep Learning technology has been proposed in different fields, bringing many advances in each of them, but identifying new threats in these solutions regarding cybersecurity. Those implemented models have brought several vulnerabilities associated with Deep Learning technology. Moreover, those allow taking advantage of the implemented model, obtaining private information, and even modifying the model's decision-making. Therefore, interest in studying those vulnerabilities/attacks and designing defenses to avoid or fight them is gaining prominence among researchers. In particular, the widely known evasion attack is being analyzed by researchers; thus, several defenses to avoid such a threat can be found in the literature. Since the presentation of the L-BFG algorithm, this threat concerns the research community. However, it continues developing new and ingenious countermeasures since there is no perfect defense for all the known evasion algorithms. In this work, a novel detector of evasion attacks is developed. It focuses on the information of the activations of the neurons given by the model when an input sample is injected. Moreover, it puts attention to the topology of the targeted deep learning model to analyze the activations according to which neurons are connecting. This approach has been decided because the literature shows that the targeted model's topology contains essential information about if the evasion attack occurs. For this purpose, a huge data preprocessing is required to introduce all this information in the detector, which uses the Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCN) technology. Thus, it understands the topology of the target model, obtaining promising results and improving the outcomes presented in the literature related to similar defenses.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.
Builds on
20 of 40 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2019Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 115
8 more
- 2019Summit: Scaling Deep Learning Interpretability by Visualizing Activation and Attribution Summarizationscited by 72
- 2021Adversarial Example Detection for DNN Models: A Review and Experimental Comparisoncited by 51
- 2021Sampling methods for efficient training of graph convolutional networks: A surveycited by 40
- 2017Enhancing Robustness of Machine Learning Systems via Data Transformationscited by 38
- 2022ImageNet-Patch: A Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Robustness against Adversarial Patchescited by 27
- 2018Combatting Adversarial Attacks through Denoising and Dimensionality Reduction: A Cascaded Autoencoder Approachcited by 10
- 2018Mathematical Analysis of Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2020Deep Learning Defenses Against Adversarial Examples for Dynamic Risk Assessmentcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.