mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

For Better or For Worse? Learning Minimum Variance Features With Label Augmentation

arXiv 2402.06855 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation has been pivotal in successfully training deep learning models on classification tasks over the past decade. An important subclass of data augmentation techniques - which includes both label smoothing and Mixup - involves modifying not only the input data but also the input label during model training. In this work, we analyze the role played by the label augmentation aspect of such methods. We first prove that linear models on binary classification data trained with label augmentation learn only the minimum variance features in the data, while standard training (which includes weight decay) can learn higher variance features. We then use our techniques to show that even for nonlinear models and general data distributions, the label smoothing and Mixup losses are lower bounded by a function of the model output variance. Lastly, we demonstrate empirically that this aspect of label smoothing and Mixup can be a positive and a negative. On the one hand, we show that the strong performance of label smoothing and Mixup on image classification benchmarks is correlated with learning low variance hidden representations. On the other hand, we show that Mixup and label smoothing can be more susceptible to low variance spurious correlations in the training data.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2024.

Builds on

41 of 55 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  8. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  9. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  10. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  11. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  12. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
29 more
  1. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  2. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
  3. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
  4. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  5. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  6. 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
  7. 2020SaliencyMix: A Saliency Guided Data Augmentation Strategy for Better Regularizationcited by 149
  8. 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
  9. 2021Learning with invariances in random features and kernel modelscited by 89
  10. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  11. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 60
  12. 2020On the Generalization Effects of Linear Transformations in Data Augmentationcited by 47
  13. 2020Regularization via Structural Label Smoothingcited by 29
  14. 2022Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularizationcited by 28
  15. 2021Noisy Feature Mixupcited by 27
  16. 2022A Unified Analysis of Mixed Sample Data Augmentation: A Loss Function Perspectivecited by 27
  17. 2021Diversifying Dialog Generation via Adaptive Label Smoothingcited by 25
  18. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  19. 2021Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Trainingcited by 19
  20. 2023The Benefits of Mixup for Feature Learningcited by 19
  21. 2019Does Data Augmentation Lead to Positive Margin?cited by 18
  22. 2022Data Augmentation as Feature Manipulationcited by 18
  23. 2020Towards Understanding Label Smoothingcited by 17
  24. 2022Data Augmentation vs. Equivariant Networks: A Theory of Generalization on Dynamics Forecastingcited by 17
  25. 2020How Data Augmentation affects Optimization for Linear Regressioncited by 15
  26. 2022Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixupcited by 14
  27. 2021Mixup Decoding for Diverse Machine Translationcited by 10
  28. 2023On the Limitations of Temperature Scaling for Distributions with Overlapscited by 7
  29. 2023Provable Benefit of Mixup for Finding Optimal Decision Boundariescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.