The Benefits of Mixup for Feature Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mixup, a simple data augmentation method that randomly mixes two data points via linear interpolation, has been extensively applied in various deep learning applications to gain better generalization. However, the theoretical underpinnings of its efficacy are not yet fully understood. In this paper, we aim to seek a fundamental understanding of the benefits of Mixup. We first show that Mixup using different linear interpolation parameters for features and labels can still achieve similar performance to the standard Mixup. This indicates that the intuitive linearity explanation in Zhang et al., (2018) may not fully explain the success of Mixup. Then we perform a theoretical study of Mixup from the feature learning perspective. We consider a feature-noise data model and show that Mixup training can effectively learn the rare features (appearing in a small fraction of data) from its mixture with the common features (appearing in a large fraction of data). In contrast, standard training can only learn the common features but fails to learn the rare features, thus suffering from bad generalization performance. Moreover, our theoretical analysis also shows that the benefits of Mixup for feature learning are mostly gained in the early training phase, based on which we propose to apply early stopping in Mixup. Experimental results verify our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the early-stopped Mixup training.
Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2023.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2020Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learningcited by 292
- 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
- 2022G-Mixup: Graph Data Augmentation for Graph Classificationcited by 145
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2020Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep Learningcited by 107
- 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
- 2022Benign Overfitting in Two-layer Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 90
- 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 82
- 2022Benign Overfitting without Linearity: Neural Network Classifiers Trained by Gradient Descent for Noisy Linear Datacited by 74
- 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
12 more
- 2022Towards Understanding Mixture of Experts in Deep Learningcited by 52
- 2021Understanding the Generalization of Adam in Learning Neural Networks with Proper Regularizationcited by 48
- 2020On the Generalization Effects of Linear Transformations in Data Augmentationcited by 47
- 2022Towards understanding how momentum improves generalization in deep learningcited by 40
- 2022A Unified Analysis of Mixed Sample Data Augmentation: A Loss Function Perspectivecited by 27
- 2021Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Trainingcited by 19
- 2019Does Data Augmentation Lead to Positive Margin?cited by 18
- 2022Data Augmentation as Feature Manipulationcited by 18
- 2020How Data Augmentation affects Optimization for Linear Regressioncited by 15
- 2019A Group-Theoretic Framework for Data Augmentationcited by 14
- 2022Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixupcited by 14
- 2022Max-Margin Works while Large Margin Fails: Generalization without Uniform Convergencecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
19 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023Toward Understanding Generative Data Augmentationcited by 25
- 2024Federated Learning from Vision-Language Foundation Models: Theoretical Analysis and Methodcited by 21
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Neural Networks via Gradient Feature Learningcited by 13
- 2023Selective Mixup Helps with Distribution Shifts, But Not (Only) because of Mixupcited by 8
- 2023Per-Example Gradient Regularization Improves Learning Signals from Noisy Datacited by 7
- 2024DASH: Warm-Starting Neural Network Training in Stationary Settings without Loss of Plasticitycited by 7
- 2024Provably Neural Active Learning Succeeds via Prioritizing Perplexing Samplescited by 5
- 2024Provable Benefit of Cutout and CutMix for Feature Learningcited by 4
- 2025On the Role of Label Noise in the Feature Learning Processcited by 4
- 2025How Does Label Noise Gradient Descent Improve Generalization in the Low SNR Regime?cited by 4
- 2024Data Augmentation for Traffic Classificationcited by 3
- 2024For Better or For Worse? Learning Minimum Variance Features With Label Augmentationcited by 3
7 more
- 2025pMixFed: Efficient Personalized Federated Learning through Adaptive Layer-Wise Mixupcited by 2
- 2025Rethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026Provable Effects of Data Replay in Continual Learning: A Feature Learning Perspectivecited by 1
- 2023Semantic Equivariant Mixupcited by 0
- 2026Differential Privacy in Two-Layer Networks: How DP-SGD Harms Fairness and Robustnesscited by 0
- 2026Improving Generalization and Robustness in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Boundary-Aware Data Augmentationcited by 0
- 2026Improving Generalization and Robustness in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Boundary-Aware Data Augmentation22 Aug 2026
- 2026Differential Privacy in Two-Layer Networks: How DP-SGD Harms Fairness and Robustness5 Mar 2026
- 2026Provable Effects of Data Replay in Continual Learning: A Feature Learning Perspective2 Feb 2026
- 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspective22 Nov 2025
- 2025How Does Label Noise Gradient Descent Improve Generalization in the Low SNR Regime?20 Oct 2025
- 2025On the Role of Label Noise in the Feature Learning Process25 May 2025
- 2025Rethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networks17 Feb 2025
- 2025pMixFed: Efficient Personalized Federated Learning through Adaptive Layer-Wise Mixup19 Jan 2025
- 2024Provable Benefit of Cutout and CutMix for Feature Learning31 Oct 2024
- 2024DASH: Warm-Starting Neural Network Training in Stationary Settings without Loss of Plasticity30 Oct 2024
- 2024Federated Learning from Vision-Language Foundation Models: Theoretical Analysis and Method29 Sep 2024
- 2024Provably Neural Active Learning Succeeds via Prioritizing Perplexing Samples6 Jun 2024
7 more
- 2024For Better or For Worse? Learning Minimum Variance Features With Label Augmentation10 Feb 2024
- 2024Data Augmentation for Traffic Classification19 Jan 2024
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Neural Networks via Gradient Feature Learning19 Oct 2023
- 2023Semantic Equivariant Mixup12 Aug 2023
- 2023Toward Understanding Generative Data Augmentation27 May 2023
- 2023Selective Mixup Helps with Distribution Shifts, But Not (Only) because of Mixup26 May 2023
- 2023Per-Example Gradient Regularization Improves Learning Signals from Noisy Data31 Mar 2023
- 2023Toward Understanding Generative Data Augmentationcited by 25
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Neural Networks via Gradient Feature Learningcited by 13
- 2023Selective Mixup Helps with Distribution Shifts, But Not (Only) because of Mixupcited by 8
- 2023Per-Example Gradient Regularization Improves Learning Signals from Noisy Datacited by 7
- 2024DASH: Warm-Starting Neural Network Training in Stationary Settings without Loss of Plasticitycited by 7
- 2024Provably Neural Active Learning Succeeds via Prioritizing Perplexing Samplescited by 5
- 2024Provable Benefit of Cutout and CutMix for Feature Learningcited by 4
- 2025On the Role of Label Noise in the Feature Learning Processcited by 4
- 2025How Does Label Noise Gradient Descent Improve Generalization in the Low SNR Regime?cited by 4
- 2024Data Augmentation for Traffic Classificationcited by 3
- 2024For Better or For Worse? Learning Minimum Variance Features With Label Augmentationcited by 3
- 2025pMixFed: Efficient Personalized Federated Learning through Adaptive Layer-Wise Mixupcited by 2
12 most cited of 17 All 17 (JSON)
- 2026Differential Privacy in Two-Layer Networks: How DP-SGD Harms Fairness and Robustness5 Mar 2026
- 2026Provable Effects of Data Replay in Continual Learning: A Feature Learning Perspective2 Feb 2026
- 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspective22 Nov 2025
- 2025How Does Label Noise Gradient Descent Improve Generalization in the Low SNR Regime?20 Oct 2025
- 2025On the Role of Label Noise in the Feature Learning Process25 May 2025
- 2025Rethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networks17 Feb 2025
- 2025pMixFed: Efficient Personalized Federated Learning through Adaptive Layer-Wise Mixup19 Jan 2025
- 2024Provable Benefit of Cutout and CutMix for Feature Learning31 Oct 2024
- 2024DASH: Warm-Starting Neural Network Training in Stationary Settings without Loss of Plasticity30 Oct 2024
- 2024Provably Neural Active Learning Succeeds via Prioritizing Perplexing Samples6 Jun 2024
- 2024For Better or For Worse? Learning Minimum Variance Features With Label Augmentation10 Feb 2024
- 2024Data Augmentation for Traffic Classification19 Jan 2024
12 newest of 17 All 17 (JSON)