Gradient Aligned Regression via Pairwise Losses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Regression is a fundamental task in machine learning that has garnered extensive attention over the past decades. The conventional approach for regression involves employing loss functions that primarily concentrate on aligning model prediction with the ground truth for each individual data sample. Recent research endeavors have introduced novel perspectives by incorporating label similarity to regression via imposing extra pairwise regularization on the latent feature space and demonstrated the effectiveness. However, there are two drawbacks for those approaches: i) their pairwise operation in latent feature space is computationally more expensive than conventional regression losses; ii) it lacks of theoretical justifications behind such regularization. In this work, we propose GAR (Gradient Aligned Regression) as a competitive alternative method in label space, which is constituted by a conventional regression loss and two pairwise label difference losses for gradient alignment including magnitude and direction. GAR enjoys: i) the same level efficiency as conventional regression loss because the quadratic complexity for the proposed pairwise losses can be reduced to linear complexity; ii) theoretical insights from learning the pairwise label difference to learning the gradient of the ground truth function. We limit our current scope as regression on the clean data setting without noises, outliers or distributional shifts, etc. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method practically on two synthetic datasets and on eight extensive real-world tasks from six benchmark datasets with other eight competitive baselines. Running time experiments demonstrate the superior efficiency of the proposed GAR over existing methods with pairwise regularization in latent feature space and ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of each component for GAR.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.
Builds on
18 of 47 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
- 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
- 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 97
- 2022Balanced MSE for Imbalanced Visual Regressioncited by 89
- 2022Rank-N-Contrast: Learning Continuous Representations for Regressioncited by 74
- 2018Efficient Algorithms for Outlier-Robust Regressioncited by 72
- 2022RankSim: Ranking Similarity Regularization for Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 52
- 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 47
6 more
- 2023Improving Deep Regression with Ordinal Entropycited by 44
- 2017Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperaturecited by 32
- 2020Online Robust Regression via SGD on the l1 losscited by 20
- 2023ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 19
- 2023A survey and taxonomy of loss functions in machine learningcited by 15
- 2021Label Distributionally Robust Losses for Multi-class Classification: Consistency, Robustness and Adaptivitycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026LLM-Augmented Computational Phenotyping of Long Covidcited by 0
- 2026LLM-Augmented Computational Phenotyping of Long Covid18 Mar 2026