mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics Informed and Data Driven Simulation of Underwater Images via Residual Learning

arXiv 2402.05281 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2024cs.CV eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In general, underwater images suffer from color distortion and low contrast, because light is attenuated and backscattered as it propagates through water (differently depending on wavelength and on the properties of the water body). An existing simple degradation model (similar to atmospheric image "hazing" effects), though helpful, is not sufficient to properly represent the underwater image degradation because there are unaccounted for and non-measurable factors e.g. scattering of light due to turbidity of water, reflective characteristics of turbid medium etc. We propose a deep learning-based architecture to automatically simulate the underwater effects where only a dehazing-like image formation equation is known to the network, and the additional degradation due to the other unknown factors if inferred in a data-driven way. We only use RGB images (because in real-time scenario depth image is not available) to estimate the depth image. For testing, we have proposed (due to the lack of real underwater image datasets) a complex image formation model/equation to manually generate images that resemble real underwater images (used as ground truth). However, only the classical image formation equation (the one used for image dehazing) is informed to the network. This mimics the fact that in a real scenario, the physics are never completely known and only simplified models are known. Thanks to the ground truth, generated by a complex image formation equation, we could successfully perform a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of proposed technique, compared to other purely data driven approaches

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.

Builds on

19 of 52 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
  4. 2014Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Networkcited by 1,274
  5. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,039
  6. 2016Unsupervised Monocular Depth Estimation with Left-Right Consistencycited by 820
  7. 2018Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 795
  8. 2017Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networkscited by 603
  9. 2016DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removalcited by 314
  10. 2017DualGAN: Unsupervised Dual Learning for Image-to-Image Translationcited by 310
  11. 2017Toward Multimodal Image-to-Image Translationcited by 296
  12. 2018Diverse Image-to-Image Translation via Disentangled Representationscited by 296
7 more
  1. 2017Learning to Discover Cross-Domain Relations with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
  2. 2018DeepMVS: Learning Multi-view Stereopsiscited by 277
  3. 2017Large Kernel Matters -- Improve Semantic Segmentation by Global Convolutional Networkcited by 208
  4. 2016DeMoN: Depth and Motion Network for Learning Monocular Stereocited by 201
  5. 2018High Quality Monocular Depth Estimation via Transfer Learningcited by 133
  6. 2016Unsupervised Cross-Domain Image Generationcited by 125
  7. 2020Single Image Depth Estimation Trained via Depth from Defocus Cuescited by 45

Built on by

Not cited yet.