mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LEVI: Generalizable Fine-tuning via Layer-wise Ensemble of Different Views

arXiv 2402.04644 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning is becoming widely used for leveraging the power of pre-trained foundation models in new downstream tasks. While there are many successes of fine-tuning on various tasks, recent studies have observed challenges in the generalization of fine-tuned models to unseen distributions (i.e., out-of-distribution; OOD). To improve OOD generalization, some previous studies identify the limitations of fine-tuning data and regulate fine-tuning to preserve the general representation learned from pre-training data. However, potential limitations in the pre-training data and models are often ignored. In this paper, we contend that overly relying on the pre-trained representation may hinder fine-tuning from learning essential representations for downstream tasks and thus hurt its OOD generalization. It can be especially catastrophic when new tasks are from different (sub)domains compared to pre-training data. To address the issues in both pre-training and fine-tuning data, we propose a novel generalizable fine-tuning method LEVI (Layer-wise Ensemble of different VIews), where the pre-trained model is adaptively ensembled layer-wise with a small task-specific model, while preserving its efficiencies. By combining two complementing models, LEVI effectively suppresses problematic features in both the fine-tuning data and pre-trained model and preserves useful features for new tasks. Broad experiments with large language and vision models show that LEVI greatly improves fine-tuning generalization via emphasizing different views from fine-tuning data and pre-trained features.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.

Builds on

73 of 96 references.

References · 73

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  10. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  11. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  12. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
38 more
  1. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  2. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  3. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  4. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  5. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  6. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  9. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  10. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  11. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  12. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  13. 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  14. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  15. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  16. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
  17. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  18. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  19. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  20. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  21. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
  22. 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 449
  23. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  24. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  25. 2022Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5)cited by 396
  26. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
  27. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 368
  28. 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
  29. 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 333
  30. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  31. 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
  32. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  33. 2020Domain Generalization using Causal Matchingcited by 224
  34. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
  35. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  36. 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
  37. 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
  38. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148

50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.