LEVI: Generalizable Fine-tuning via Layer-wise Ensemble of Different Views
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning is becoming widely used for leveraging the power of pre-trained foundation models in new downstream tasks. While there are many successes of fine-tuning on various tasks, recent studies have observed challenges in the generalization of fine-tuned models to unseen distributions (i.e., out-of-distribution; OOD). To improve OOD generalization, some previous studies identify the limitations of fine-tuning data and regulate fine-tuning to preserve the general representation learned from pre-training data. However, potential limitations in the pre-training data and models are often ignored. In this paper, we contend that overly relying on the pre-trained representation may hinder fine-tuning from learning essential representations for downstream tasks and thus hurt its OOD generalization. It can be especially catastrophic when new tasks are from different (sub)domains compared to pre-training data. To address the issues in both pre-training and fine-tuning data, we propose a novel generalizable fine-tuning method LEVI (Layer-wise Ensemble of different VIews), where the pre-trained model is adaptively ensembled layer-wise with a small task-specific model, while preserving its efficiencies. By combining two complementing models, LEVI effectively suppresses problematic features in both the fine-tuning data and pre-trained model and preserves useful features for new tasks. Broad experiments with large language and vision models show that LEVI greatly improves fine-tuning generalization via emphasizing different views from fine-tuning data and pre-trained features.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
73 of 96 references.
References · 73
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
38 more
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 449
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2022Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5)cited by 396
- 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
- 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 368
- 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 333
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
- 2020Domain Generalization using Causal Matchingcited by 224
- 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal Representationscited by 14
- 2024Weak-to-Strong Generalization beyond Accuracy: a Pilot Study in Safety, Toxicity, and Legal Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026ART: Adaptive Reasoning Trees for Explainable Claim Verificationcited by 0
- 2026Selective, Regularized, and Calibrated: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026Selective, Regularized, and Calibrated: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation19 May 2026
- 2026ART: Adaptive Reasoning Trees for Explainable Claim Verification9 Jan 2026
- 2025Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal Representations5 Aug 2025
- 2024Weak-to-Strong Generalization beyond Accuracy: a Pilot Study in Safety, Toxicity, and Legal Reasoning16 Oct 2024