Symbol Correctness in Deep Neural Networks Containing Symbolic Layers
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
To handle AI tasks that combine perception and logical reasoning, recent work introduces Neurosymbolic Deep Neural Networks (NS-DNNs), which contain -- in addition to traditional neural layers -- symbolic layers: symbolic expressions (e.g., SAT formulas, logic programs) that are evaluated by symbolic solvers during inference. We identify and formalize an intuitive, high-level principle that can guide the design and analysis of NS-DNNs: symbol correctness, the correctness of the intermediate symbols predicted by the neural layers with respect to a (generally unknown) ground-truth symbolic representation of the input data. We demonstrate that symbol correctness is a necessary property for NS-DNN explainability and transfer learning (despite being in general impossible to train for). Moreover, we show that the framework of symbol correctness provides a precise way to reason and communicate about model behavior at neural-symbolic boundaries, and gives insight into the fundamental tradeoffs faced by NS-DNN training algorithms. In doing so, we both identify significant points of ambiguity in prior work, and provide a framework to support further NS-DNN developments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
- 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 224
- 2019SATNet: Bridging deep learning and logical reasoning using a differentiable satisfiability solvercited by 173
- 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
- 2020Closed Loop Neural-Symbolic Learning via Integrating Neural Perception, Grammar Parsing, and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 58
- 2021Techniques for Symbol Grounding with SATNetcited by 24
- 2023Assessing SATNet's Ability to Solve the Symbol Grounding Problemcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Neural Concept Bindercited by 14
- 2024Neural Concept Binder14 Jun 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Mapping the Neuro-Symbolic AI Landscape by Architectures: A Handbook on Augmenting Deep Learning Through Symbolic Reasoning
- 2025A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning
- 2023A Novel Neural-symbolic System under Statistical Relational Learning
- 2024Neuro-symbolic Learning Yielding Logical Constraints
- 2025Reasoning in Neurosymbolic AI
- 2022Is Neuro-Symbolic AI Meeting its Promise in Natural Language Processing? A Structured Review
- 2022Deep Symbolic Learning: Discovering Symbols and Rules from Perceptions
- 2023Extensions to Generalized Annotated Logic and an Equivalent Neural Architecture