mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identifying Reasons for Contraceptive Switching from Real-World Data Using Large Language Models

arXiv 2402.03597 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prescription contraceptives play a critical role in supporting women's reproductive health. With nearly 50 million women in the United States using contraceptives, understanding the factors that drive contraceptives selection and switching is of significant interest. However, many factors related to medication switching are often only captured in unstructured clinical notes and can be difficult to extract. Here, we evaluate the zero-shot abilities of a recently developed large language model, GPT-4 (via HIPAA-compliant Microsoft Azure API), to identify reasons for switching between classes of contraceptives from the UCSF Information Commons clinical notes dataset. We demonstrate that GPT-4 can accurately extract reasons for contraceptive switching, outperforming baseline BERT-based models with microF1 scores of 0.849 and 0.881 for contraceptive start and stop extraction, respectively. Human evaluation of GPT-4-extracted reasons for switching showed 91.4% accuracy, with minimal hallucinations. Using extracted reasons, we identified patient preference, adverse events, and insurance as key reasons for switching using unsupervised topic modeling approaches. Notably, we also showed using our approach that "weight gain/mood change" and "insurance coverage" are disproportionately found as reasons for contraceptive switching in specific demographic populations. Our code and supplemental data are available at https://github.com/BMiao10/contraceptive-switching.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.

Builds on

8 of 33 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  4. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
  5. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
  6. 2023LLMs Accelerate Annotation for Medical Information Extractioncited by 77
  7. 2023The Shaky Foundations of Clinical Foundation Models: A Survey of Large Language Models and Foundation Models for EMRscited by 29
  8. 2022Developing a general-purpose clinical language inference model from a large corpus of clinical notescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Evaluating the Presence of Sex Bias in Clinical Reasoning by Large Language Models
  2. 2025The Alignment Paradox of Medical Large Language Models in Infertility Care: Decoupling Algorithmic Improvement from Clinical Decision-making Quality
  3. 2025Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model System for Comprehensive Drug Contraindications
  4. 2025Human-Level and Beyond: Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Clinical Pharmacists in Prescription Review
  5. 2025MEDEQUALQA: Evaluating Biases in LLMs with Counterfactual Reasoning
  6. 2023ExplainCPE: A Free-text Explanation Benchmark of Chinese Pharmacist Examination
  7. 2025Robust or Suggestible? Exploring Non-Clinical Induction in LLM Drug-Safety Decisions
  8. 2025Towards Transparent Reasoning: What Drives Faithfulness in Large Language Models?