mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Putting Context in Context: the Impact of Discussion Structure on Text Classification

arXiv 2402.02975 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current text classification approaches usually focus on the content to be classified. Contextual aspects (both linguistic and extra-linguistic) are usually neglected, even in tasks based on online discussions. Still in many cases the multi-party and multi-turn nature of the context from which these elements are selected can be fruitfully exploited. In this work, we propose a series of experiments on a large dataset for stance detection in English, in which we evaluate the contribution of different types of contextual information, i.e. linguistic, structural and temporal, by feeding them as natural language input into a transformer-based model. We also experiment with different amounts of training data and analyse the topology of local discussion networks in a privacy-compliant way. Results show that structural information can be highly beneficial to text classification but only under certain circumstances (e.g. depending on the amount of training data and on discussion chain complexity). Indeed, we show that contextual information on smaller datasets from other classification tasks does not yield significant improvements. Our framework, based on local discussion networks, allows the integration of structural information, while minimising user profiling, thus preserving their privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

30 of 43 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  5. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
  6. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  7. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
  8. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
  9. 2020FANG: Leveraging Social Context for Fake News Detection Using Graph Representationcited by 99
  10. 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
  11. 2017Beyond News Contents: The Role of Social Context for Fake News Detectioncited by 91
  12. 2021User Preference-aware Fake News Detectioncited by 79
18 more
  1. 2018RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumourscited by 75
  2. 2021BertGCN: Transductive Text Classification by Combining GCN and BERTcited by 74
  3. 2018Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failurecited by 73
  4. 2018Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanshipcited by 34
  5. 2017An optimal transportation approach for assessing almost stochastic ordercited by 33
  6. 2022Hate Speech and Counter Speech Detection: Conversational Context Does Mattercited by 32
  7. 2021Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Keycited by 29
  8. 2021The Structure of Toxic Conversations on Twittercited by 22
  9. 2021Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detectioncited by 19
  10. 2020The Role of Pragmatic and Discourse Context in Determining Argument Impactcited by 18
  11. 2022GraphNLI: A Graph-based Natural Language Inference Model for Polarity Prediction in Online Debatescited by 14
  12. 2018Examining a hate speech corpus for hate speech detection and popularity predictioncited by 10
  13. 2017Improved Abusive Comment Moderation with User Embeddingscited by 9
  14. 2021Revisiting Contextual Toxicity Detection in Conversationscited by 8
  15. 2019Determining Relative Argument Specificity and Stance for Complex Argumentative Structurescited by 7
  16. 2020Toward Stance-based Personas for Opinionated Dialoguescited by 6
  17. 2022Contextual information integration for stance detection via cross-attentioncited by 6
  18. 2022CRUSH: Contextually Regularized and User anchored Self-supervised Hate speech Detectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.