Evaluating the Robustness of Off-Road Autonomous Driving Segmentation against Adversarial Attacks: A Dataset-Centric analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study investigates the vulnerability of semantic segmentation models to adversarial input perturbations, in the domain of off-road autonomous driving. Despite good performance in generic conditions, the state-of-the-art classifiers are often susceptible to (even) small perturbations, ultimately resulting in inaccurate predictions with high confidence. Prior research has directed their focus on making models more robust by modifying the architecture and training with noisy input images, but has not explored the influence of datasets in adversarial attacks. Our study aims to address this gap by examining the impact of non-robust features in off-road datasets and comparing the effects of adversarial attacks on different segmentation network architectures. To enable this, a robust dataset is created consisting of only robust features and training the networks on this robustified dataset. We present both qualitative and quantitative analysis of our findings, which have important implications on improving the robustness of machine learning models in off-road autonomous driving applications. Additionally, this work contributes to the safe navigation of autonomous robot Unimog U5023 in rough off-road unstructured environments by evaluating the robustness of segmentation outputs. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/rohtkumar/adversarial_attacks_ on_segmentation
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2024.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
8 more
- 2017LinkNet: Exploiting Encoder Representations for Efficient Semantic Segmentationcited by 212
- 2020PnPNet: End-to-End Perception and Prediction with Tracking in the Loopcited by 143
- 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 79
- 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
- 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
- 2018The Curse of Concentration in Robust Learning: Evasion and Poisoning Attacks from Concentration of Measurecited by 44
- 2017Adversarial Example Defenses: Ensembles of Weak Defenses are not Strongcited by 32
- 2022On the Real-World Adversarial Robustness of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.