Position Paper: Why the Shooting in the Dark Method Dominates Recommender Systems Practice; A Call to Abandon Anti-Utopian Thinking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Applied recommender systems research is in a curious position. While there is a very rigorous protocol for measuring performance by A/B testing, best practice for finding a `B' to test does not explicitly target performance but rather targets a proxy measure. The success or failure of a given A/B test then depends entirely on if the proposed proxy is better correlated to performance than the previous proxy. No principle exists to identify if one proxy is better than another offline, leaving the practitioners shooting in the dark. The purpose of this position paper is to question this anti-Utopian thinking and argue that a non-standard use of the deep learning stacks actually has the potential to unlock reward optimizing recommendation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2024.
Builds on
8 of 52 references.
References · 8
- 2022Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddingscited by 53
- 2021A Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Review and Future Directionscited by 19
- 2023Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy Learningcited by 15
- 2021On component interactions in two-stage recommender systemscited by 14
- 2023Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Policy Convolutioncited by 14
- 2022Probabilistic Rank and Reward: A Scalable Model for Slate Recommendationcited by 7
- 2023Maximizing the Success Probability of Policy Allocations in Online Systemscited by 4
- 2019Replacing the do-calculus with Bayes rulecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.