Mapping acceptance: micro scenarios as a dual-perspective approach for assessing public opinion and individual differences in technology perception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding public perception of technology is crucial to aligning research, development, and governance of technology. This article introduces micro scenarios as an integrative method to evaluate mental models and social acceptance across numerous technologies and concepts using a few single-item scales within a single comprehensive survey. This approach contrasts with traditional methods that focus on detailed assessments of as few as one scenario. The data can be interpreted in two ways: Perspective (1): Average evaluations of each participant can be seen as individual differences, providing reflexive measurements across technologies or topics. This helps in understanding how perceptions of technology relate to other personality factors. Perspective (2): Average evaluations of each technology or topic can be interpreted as technology attributions. This makes it possible to position technologies on visuo-spatial maps to simplify identification of critical issues, conduct comparative rankings based on selected criteria, and to analyze the interplay between different attributions. This dual approach enables the modeling of acceptance-relevant factors that shape public opinion. It offers a framework for researchers, technology developers, and policymakers to identify pivotal factors for acceptance at both the individual and technology levels. I illustrate this methodology with examples from my research, provide practical guidelines, and include R code to enable others to conduct similar studies. This paper aims to bridge the gap between technological advancement and societal perception, offering a tool for more informed decision-making in technology development and policy-making.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Mapping Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: Expectations, Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs, and Value As Determinants for Societal Acceptancecited by 3
- 2024Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AIcited by 0
- 2024Cultural Dimensions of AI Perception: Charting Expectations, Risks, Benefits, Tradeoffs, and Value in Germany and Chinacited by 0
- 2024Cultural Dimensions of AI Perception: Charting Expectations, Risks, Benefits, Tradeoffs, and Value in Germany and China18 Dec 2024
- 2024Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AI2 Dec 2024
- 2024Mapping Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: Expectations, Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs, and Value As Determinants for Societal Acceptance28 Nov 2024