Developing and Evaluating a Design Method for Positive Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues advancing, ensuring positive societal impacts becomes critical, especially as AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous in various aspects of life. However, developing "AI for good" poses substantial challenges around aligning systems with complex human values. Presently, we lack mature methods for addressing these challenges. This article presents and evaluates the Positive AI design method aimed at addressing this gap. The method provides a human-centered process to translate wellbeing aspirations into concrete practices. First, we explain the method's four key steps: contextualizing, operationalizing, optimizing, and implementing wellbeing supported by continuous measurement for feedback cycles. We then present a multiple case study where novice designers applied the method, revealing strengths and weaknesses related to efficacy and usability. Next, an expert evaluation study assessed the quality of the resulting concepts, rating them moderately high for feasibility, desirability, and plausibility of achieving intended wellbeing benefits. Together, these studies provide preliminary validation of the method's ability to improve AI design, while surfacing areas needing refinement like developing support for complex steps. Proposed adaptations such as examples and evaluation heuristics could address weaknesses. Further research should examine sustained application over multiple projects. This human-centered approach shows promise for realizing the vision of 'AI for Wellbeing' that does not just avoid harm, but actively benefits humanity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.
Builds on
19 of 153 references.
References · 19
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
- 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
- 2021How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Studycited by 29
- 2021Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
- 2020Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gapcited by 25
- 2022Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesiscited by 22
- 2021A Survey on Personality-Aware Recommendation Systemscited by 18
- 2021Towards A Process Model for Co-Creating AI Experiencescited by 18
7 more
- 2021Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system developmentcited by 18
- 2023Filter Bubbles in Recommender Systems: Fact or Fallacy -- A Systematic Reviewcited by 13
- 2019Enabling Value Sensitive AI Systems through Participatory Design Fictionscited by 11
- 2020IEEE 7010: A New Standard for Assessing the Well-being Implications of Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
- 2021Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligencecited by 7
- 2021Wellbeing supportive design -- Research-based guidelines for supporting psychological wellbeing in user experiencecited by 2
- 2023Positive AI: Key Challenges in Designing Artificial Intelligence for Wellbeingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.