An Information-Theoretic Approach to Analyze NLP Classification Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the importance of the inputs on the output is useful across many tasks. This work provides an information-theoretic framework to analyse the influence of inputs for text classification tasks. Natural language processing (NLP) tasks take either a single element input or multiple element inputs to predict an output variable, where an element is a block of text. Each text element has two components: an associated semantic meaning and a linguistic realization. Multiple-choice reading comprehension (MCRC) and sentiment classification (SC) are selected to showcase the framework. For MCRC, it is found that the context influence on the output compared to the question influence reduces on more challenging datasets. In particular, more challenging contexts allow a greater variation in complexity of questions. Hence, test creators need to carefully consider the choice of the context when designing multiple-choice questions for assessment. For SC, it is found the semantic meaning of the input text dominates (above 80% for all datasets considered) compared to its linguistic realisation when determining the sentiment. The framework is made available at: https://github.com/WangLuran/nlp-element-influence
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.
Builds on
32 of 71 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
20 more
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
- 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
- 2019DREAM: A Challenge Dataset and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehensioncited by 156
- 2021Shifts: A Dataset of Real Distributional Shift Across Multiple Large-Scale Taskscited by 100
- 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 99
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
- 2019Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension Datasetscited by 46
- 2020A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 41
- 2023MQAG: Multiple-choice Question Answering and Generation for Assessing Information Consistency in Summarizationcited by 30
- 2018Generating Distractors for Reading Comprehension Questions from Real Examinationscited by 24
- 2022Multiple-Choice Question Generation: Towards an Automated Assessment Frameworkcited by 23
- 2023A quantitative study of NLP approaches to question difficulty estimationcited by 12
- 2022What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Difficult?cited by 11
- 2023Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distributioncited by 7
- 2023Analyzing Multiple-Choice Reading and Listening Comprehension Testscited by 4
- 2023Efficient Fraud Detection Using Deep Boosting Decision Treescited by 3
- 2023Feature Importance Measurement based on Decision Tree Samplingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.