Efficient Fraud Detection Using Deep Boosting Decision Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fraud detection is to identify, monitor, and prevent potentially fraudulent activities from complex data. The recent development and success in AI, especially machine learning, provides a new data-driven way to deal with fraud. From a methodological point of view, machine learning based fraud detection can be divided into two categories, i.e., conventional methods (decision tree, boosting...) and deep learning, both of which have significant limitations in terms of the lack of representation learning ability for the former and interpretability for the latter. Furthermore, due to the rarity of detected fraud cases, the associated data is usually imbalanced, which seriously degrades the performance of classification algorithms. In this paper, we propose deep boosting decision trees (DBDT), a novel approach for fraud detection based on gradient boosting and neural networks. In order to combine the advantages of both conventional methods and deep learning, we first construct soft decision tree (SDT), a decision tree structured model with neural networks as its nodes, and then ensemble SDTs using the idea of gradient boosting. In this way we embed neural networks into gradient boosting to improve its representation learning capability and meanwhile maintain the interpretability. Furthermore, aiming at the rarity of detected fraud cases, in the model training phase we propose a compositional AUC maximization approach to deal with data imbalances at algorithm level. Extensive experiments on several real-life fraud detection datasets show that DBDT can significantly improve the performance and meanwhile maintain good interpretability. Our code is available at https://github.com/freshmanXB/DBDT.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2023.
Builds on
10 of 64 references.
References · 10
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
- 2019Stochastic AUC Maximization with Deep Neural Networkscited by 61
- 2013Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifierscited by 54
- 2020NBDT: Neural-Backed Decision Treescited by 46
- 2018The Impact of Class Rebalancing Techniques on the Performance and Interpretation of Defect Prediction Modelscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024An Information-Theoretic Approach to Analyze NLP Classification Taskscited by 1
- 2026Bridging Cognitive Neuroscience and Graph Intelligence: Hippocampus-Inspired Multi-View Hypergraph Learning for Web Finance Fraudcited by 0
- 2026Detection, Attribution, Narration: An End-to-End Pipeline for Explainable Money Mule Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Detection, Attribution, Narration: An End-to-End Pipeline for Explainable Money Mule Identification20 Jul 2026
- 2026Bridging Cognitive Neuroscience and Graph Intelligence: Hippocampus-Inspired Multi-View Hypergraph Learning for Web Finance Fraud16 Jan 2026
- 2024An Information-Theoretic Approach to Analyze NLP Classification Tasks1 Feb 2024