Validation, Robustness, and Accuracy of Perturbation-Based Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Time-Series Deep Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work undertakes studies to evaluate Interpretability Methods for Time-Series Deep Learning. Sensitivity analysis assesses how input changes affect the output, constituting a key component of interpretation. Among the post-hoc interpretation methods such as back-propagation, perturbation, and approximation, my work will investigate perturbation-based sensitivity Analysis methods on modern Transformer models to benchmark their performances. Specifically, my work answers three research questions: 1) Do different sensitivity analysis (SA) methods yield comparable outputs and attribute importance rankings? 2) Using the same sensitivity analysis method, do different Deep Learning (DL) models impact the output of the sensitivity analysis? 3) How well do the results from sensitivity analysis methods align with the ground truth?
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.
Builds on
7 of 10 references.
References · 7
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
- 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 60
- 2023Population Age Group Sensitivity for COVID-19 Infections with Deep Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.