mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GAPS: Geometry-Aware Problem Solver

arXiv 2401.16287 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geometry problem solving presents a formidable challenge within the NLP community. Existing approaches often rely on models designed for solving math word problems, neglecting the unique characteristics of geometry math problems. Additionally, the current research predominantly focuses on geometry calculation problems, while overlooking other essential aspects like proving. In this study, we address these limitations by proposing the Geometry-Aware Problem Solver (GAPS) model. GAPS is specifically designed to generate solution programs for geometry math problems of various types with the help of its unique problem-type classifier. To achieve this, GAPS treats the solution program as a composition of operators and operands, segregating their generation processes. Furthermore, we introduce the geometry elements enhancement method, which enhances the ability of GAPS to recognize geometry elements accurately. By leveraging these improvements, GAPS showcases remarkable performance in resolving geometry math problems. Our experiments conducted on the UniGeo dataset demonstrate the superiority of GAPS over the state-of-the-art model, Geoformer. Specifically, GAPS achieves an accuracy improvement of more than 5.3% for calculation tasks and an impressive 41.1% for proving tasks. Notably, GAPS achieves an impressive accuracy of 97.5% on proving problems, representing a significant advancement in solving geometry proving tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  7. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  8. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  9. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
  10. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  11. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  12. 2021Unifying Vision-and-Language Tasks via Text Generationcited by 412
12 more
  1. 2021Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 383
  2. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
  3. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 346
  4. 2019Deep Modular Co-Attention Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  5. 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
  6. 2021GeoQA: A Geometric Question Answering Benchmark Towards Multimodal Numerical Reasoningcited by 228
  7. 2022UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulating Mathematical Expressioncited by 137
  8. 2022MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Datacited by 121
  9. 2023A Multi-Modal Neural Geometric Solver with Textual Clauses Parsed from Diagramcited by 56
  10. 2022Plane Geometry Diagram Parsingcited by 20
  11. 2023A Symbolic Character-Aware Model for Solving Geometry Problemscited by 20
  12. 2022ELASTIC: Numerical Reasoning with Adaptive Symbolic Compilercited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.