mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Capturing Pertinent Symbolic Features for Enhanced Content-Based Misinformation Detection

arXiv 2401.16285 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Preventing the spread of misinformation is challenging. The detection of misleading content presents a significant hurdle due to its extreme linguistic and domain variability. Content-based models have managed to identify deceptive language by learning representations from textual data such as social media posts and web articles. However, aggregating representative samples of this heterogeneous phenomenon and implementing effective real-world applications is still elusive. Based on analytical work on the language of misinformation, this paper analyzes the linguistic attributes that characterize this phenomenon and how representative of such features some of the most popular misinformation datasets are. We demonstrate that the appropriate use of pertinent symbolic knowledge in combination with neural language models is helpful in detecting misleading content. Our results achieve state-of-the-art performance in misinformation datasets across the board, showing that our approach offers a valid and robust alternative to multi-task transfer learning without requiring any additional training data. Furthermore, our results show evidence that structured knowledge can provide the extra boost required to address a complex and unpredictable real-world problem like misinformation detection, not only in terms of accuracy but also time efficiency and resource utilization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 441
  5. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 374
  6. 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
  7. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Few-shot Learning: Evolution, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 162
  8. 2017Beyond News Contents: The Role of Social Context for Fake News Detectioncited by 91
  9. 2017A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake Newscited by 81
  10. 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
  11. 2020Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Societycited by 72
  12. 2019In Plain Sight: Media Bias Through the Lens of Factual Reportingcited by 68
7 more
  1. 2015Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threadscited by 62
  2. 2017This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real Newscited by 59
  3. 2021A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detectioncited by 47
  4. 2018Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Mediacited by 25
  5. 2019The Future of Misinformation Detection: New Perspectives and Trendscited by 10
  6. 2020Linked Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detectioncited by 7
  7. 2022Automatic Fake News Detection: Are current models "fact-checking" or "gut-checking"?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.