Evaluation of k-means time series clustering based on z-normalization and NP-Free
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the widespread use of k-means time series clustering in various domains, there exists a gap in the literature regarding its comprehensive evaluation with different time series normalization approaches. This paper seeks to fill this gap by conducting a thorough performance evaluation of k-means time series clustering on real-world open-source time series datasets. The evaluation focuses on two distinct normalization techniques: z-normalization and NP-Free. The former is one of the most commonly used normalization approach for time series. The latter is a real-time time series representation approach, which can serve as a time series normalization approach. The primary objective of this paper is to assess the impact of these two normalization techniques on k-means time series clustering in terms of its clustering quality. The experiments employ the silhouette score, a well-established metric for evaluating the quality of clusters in a dataset. By systematically investigating the performance of k-means time series clustering with these two normalization techniques, this paper addresses the current gap in k-means time series clustering evaluation and contributes valuable insights to the development of time series clustering.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2024.
Builds on
5 of 30 references.
References · 5
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2020RePAD: Real-time Proactive Anomaly Detection for Time Seriescited by 11
- 2021How Far Should We Look Back to Achieve Effective Real-Time Time-Series Anomaly Detection?cited by 8
- 2023RePAD2: Real-Time, Lightweight, and Adaptive Anomaly Detection for Open-Ended Time Seriescited by 6
- 2023NP-Free: A Real-Time Normalization-free and Parameter-tuning-free Representation Approach for Open-ended Time Seriescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.