mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Omnipredictors for Regression and the Approximate Rank of Convex Functions

arXiv 2401.14645 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.CC cs.DScited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consider the supervised learning setting where the goal is to learn to predict labels mathbf y given points mathbf x from a distribution. An textitomnipredictor for a class mathcal L of loss functions and a class mathcal C of hypotheses is a predictor whose predictions incur less expected loss than the best hypothesis in mathcal C for every loss in mathcal L. Since the work of [GKR+21] that introduced the notion, there has been a large body of work in the setting of binary labels where mathbf y ∈ 0, 1, but much less is known about the regression setting where mathbf y ∈ [0,1] can be continuous. Our main conceptual contribution is the notion of textitsufficient statistics for loss minimization over a family of loss functions: these are a set of statistics about a distribution such that knowing them allows one to take actions that minimize the expected loss for any loss in the family. The notion of sufficient statistics relates directly to the approximate rank of the family of loss functions. Our key technical contribution is a bound of O(1/varepsilon2/3) on the ε-approximate rank of convex, Lipschitz functions on the interval [0,1], which we show is tight up to a factor of polylog (1/ε). This yields improved runtimes for learning omnipredictors for the class of all convex, Lipschitz loss functions under weak learnability assumptions about the class mathcal C. We also give efficient omnipredictors when the loss families have low-degree polynomial approximations, or arise from generalized linear models (GLMs). This translation from sufficient statistics to faster omnipredictors is made possible by lifting the technique of loss outcome indistinguishability introduced by [GKH+23] for Boolean labels to the regression setting.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  2. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  3. 2020Moment Multicalibration for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 63
  4. 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 61
  5. 2023U-Calibration: Forecasting for an Unknown Agentcited by 46
  6. 2021Multi-group Agnostic PAC Learnabilitycited by 42
  7. 2023High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 41
  8. 2023Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 36
  9. 2022Making Decisions under Outcome Performativitycited by 32
  10. 2023Loss Minimization Yields Multicalibration for Large Neural Networkscited by 19
  11. 2023Agnostically Learning Single-Index Models using Omnipredictorscited by 16
  12. 2014Factorization Norms and Hereditary Discrepancycited by 14
3 more
  1. 2022Omnipredictors for Constrained Optimizationcited by 14
  2. 2022Multicalibrated Regression for Downstream Fairnesscited by 13
  3. 2023From Pseudorandomness to Multi-Group Fairness and Backcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: