Evaluating Roadside Perception for Autonomous Vehicles: Insights from Field Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Roadside perception systems are increasingly crucial in enhancing traffic safety and facilitating cooperative driving for autonomous vehicles. Despite rapid technological advancements, a major challenge persists for this newly arising field: the absence of standardized evaluation methods and benchmarks for these systems. This limitation hampers the ability to effectively assess and compare the performance of different systems, thus constraining progress in this vital field. This paper introduces a comprehensive evaluation methodology specifically designed to assess the performance of roadside perception systems. Our methodology encompasses measurement techniques, metric selection, and experimental trial design, all grounded in real-world field testing to ensure the practical applicability of our approach. We applied our methodology in Mcityfootnoteurlhttps://mcity.umich.edu/, a controlled testing environment, to evaluate various off-the-shelf perception systems. This approach allowed for an in-depth comparative analysis of their performance in realistic scenarios, offering key insights into their respective strengths and limitations. The findings of this study are poised to inform the development of industry-standard benchmarks and evaluation methods, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of roadside perception system development and deployment for autonomous vehicles. We anticipate that this paper will stimulate essential discourse on standardizing evaluation methods for roadside perception systems, thus pushing the frontiers of this technology. Furthermore, our results offer both academia and industry a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities of contemporary infrastructure-based perception systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.
Builds on
13 of 24 references.
References · 13
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2016Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Trackingcited by 685
- 2020HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-Object Trackingcited by 546
- 2016MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Trackingcited by 531
- 2020MOT20: A benchmark for multi object tracking in crowded scenescited by 355
- 2020TAO: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tracking Any Objectcited by 146
- 2023Collaborative Perception in Autonomous Driving: Methods, Datasets and Challengescited by 87
- 2022Latency-Aware Collaborative Perceptioncited by 86
- 2020Learning to Communicate and Correct Pose Errorscited by 46
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification of Collaborative Detection for Self-Drivingcited by 46
- 2022Real-time Full-stack Traffic Scene Perception for Autonomous Driving with Roadside Camerascited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.