mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tight Verification of Probabilistic Robustness in Bayesian Neural Networks

arXiv 2401.11627 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.FLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce two algorithms for computing tight guarantees on the probabilistic robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Computing robustness guarantees for BNNs is a significantly more challenging task than verifying the robustness of standard Neural Networks (NNs) because it requires searching the parameters' space for safe weights. Moreover, tight and complete approaches for the verification of standard NNs, such as those based on Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP), cannot be directly used for the verification of BNNs because of the polynomial terms resulting from the consecutive multiplication of variables encoding the weights. Our algorithms efficiently and effectively search the parameters' space for safe weights by using iterative expansion and the network's gradient and can be used with any verification algorithm of choice for BNNs. In addition to proving that our algorithms compute tighter bounds than the SoA, we also evaluate our algorithms against the SoA on standard benchmarks, such as MNIST and CIFAR10, showing that our algorithms compute bounds up to 40% tighter than the SoA.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2024.

Builds on

28 of 59 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  6. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  7. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  8. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  9. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  10. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
  11. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  12. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
16 more
  1. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
  2. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
  3. 2017Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 99
  4. 2020Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Gradient-Based Attackscited by 48
  5. 2020Probabilistic Safety for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 42
  6. 2019Statistical Guarantees for the Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 35
  7. 2018Robustness Guarantees for Bayesian Inference with Gaussian Processescited by 23
  8. 2021Make Sure You're Unsure: A Framework for Verifying Probabilistic Specificationscited by 18
  9. 2021Infinite Time Horizon Safety of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 13
  10. 2022On the Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Adversarial Attackscited by 12
  11. 2023BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic Programmingcited by 8
  12. 2023Adversarial Robustness Certification for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 7
  13. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks Against Different Types of Attackscited by 6
  14. 2023Using Z3 for Formal Modeling and Verification of FNN Global Robustnesscited by 5
  15. 2021Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to White-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 4
  16. 2022Robustness Guarantees for Credal Bayesian Networks via Constraint Relaxation over Probabilistic Circuitscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.