mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Generative Explainers using Counterfactual Inference: A Case Study on the Morpho-MNIST Dataset

arXiv 2401.11394 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2024cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose leveraging causal generative learning as an interpretable tool for explaining image classifiers. Specifically, we present a generative counterfactual inference approach to study the influence of visual features (i.e., pixels) as well as causal factors through generative learning. To this end, we first uncover the most influential pixels on a classifier's decision by varying the value of a causal attribute via counterfactual inference and computing both Shapely and contrastive explanations for counterfactual images with these different attribute values. We then establish a Monte-Carlo mechanism using the generator of a causal generative model in order to adapt Shapley explainers to produce feature importances for the human-interpretable attributes of a causal dataset in the case where a classifier has been trained exclusively on the images of the dataset. Finally, we present optimization methods for creating counterfactual explanations of classifiers by means of counterfactual inference, proposing straightforward approaches for both differentiable and arbitrary classifiers. We exploit the Morpho-MNIST causal dataset as a case study for exploring our proposed methods for generating counterfacutl explantions. We employ visual explanation methods from OmnixAI open source toolkit to compare them with our proposed methods. By employing quantitative metrics to measure the interpretability of counterfactual explanations, we find that our proposed methods of counterfactual explanation offer more interpretable explanations compared to those generated from OmnixAI. This finding suggests that our methods are well-suited for generating highly interpretable counterfactual explanations on causal datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2024.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  4. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  5. 2016Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 350
  6. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
  7. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  8. 2016Adversarially Learned Inferencecited by 216
  9. 2020Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inferencecited by 210
  10. 2017CausalGAN: Learning Causal Implicit Generative Models with Adversarial Trainingcited by 152
  11. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  12. 2018Morpho-MNIST: Quantitative Assessment and Diagnostics for Representation Learningcited by 56
8 more
  1. 2020Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Image Classifiers: A Causal Perspective Using Counterfactualscited by 56
  2. 2020Generative causal explanations of black-box classifierscited by 41
  3. 2021Generating Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations By Implicit Minimisation of Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertaintiescited by 41
  4. 2021Conditional Generative Models for Counterfactual Explanationscited by 28
  5. 2021ECINN: Efficient Counterfactuals from Invertible Neural Networkscited by 26
  6. 2019Explaining Visual Models by Causal Attributioncited by 18
  7. 2021Model-Based Counterfactual Synthesizer for Interpretationcited by 14
  8. 2021On Quantitative Evaluations of Counterfactualscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.