FAIR Enough: How Can We Develop and Assess a FAIR-Compliant Dataset for Large Language Models' Training?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the necessity for ethical considerations and data integrity in AI development, particularly emphasizing the role of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. While these principles are crucial for ethical data stewardship, their specific application in the context of LLM training data remains an under-explored area. This research gap is the focus of our study, which begins with an examination of existing literature to underline the importance of FAIR principles in managing data for LLM training. Building upon this, we propose a novel framework designed to integrate FAIR principles into the LLM development lifecycle. A contribution of our work is the development of a comprehensive checklist intended to guide researchers and developers in applying FAIR data principles consistently across the model development process. The utility and effectiveness of our framework are validated through a case study on creating a FAIR-compliant dataset aimed at detecting and mitigating biases in LLMs. We present this framework to the community as a tool to foster the creation of technologically advanced, ethically grounded, and socially responsible AI models.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.
Builds on
27 of 74 references.
References · 27
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
- 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
15 more
- 2023Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Conversational Recommenderscited by 126
- 2021Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Surveycited by 108
- 2019Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelinescited by 107
- 2021Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcingcited by 52
- 2021Towards Efficient Post-training Quantization of Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 37
- 2022Augmenting Interpretable Models with LLMs during Trainingcited by 36
- 2022Dbias: Detecting biases and ensuring Fairness in news articlescited by 28
- 2023NBIAS: A Natural Language Processing Framework for Bias Identification in Textcited by 23
- 2023Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Refute Misconceptionscited by 20
- 2022FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspectivecited by 13
- 2023How Abstract Is Linguistic Generalization in Large Language Models? Experiments with Argument Structurecited by 13
- 2023Fairness in Machine Learning meets with Equity in Healthcarecited by 5
- 2023Towards a conceptual model for the FAIR Digital Object Frameworkcited by 2
- 2020An Ecosystem Approach to Ethical AI and Data Use: Experimental Reflectionscited by 1
- 2022AI Fairness: from Principles to Practicecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6.
9 papers.
- 2024Fairness and Bias in Multimodal AI: A Surveycited by 19
- 2025HumaniBench: A Human-Centric Framework for Large Multimodal Models Evaluationcited by 19
- 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arenacited by 6
- 2024Leveraging Multi-AI Agents for Cross-Domain Knowledge Discoverycited by 4
- 2025Just as Humans Need Vaccines, So Do Models: Model Immunization to Combat Falsehoodscited by 3
- 2025LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluationcited by 1
- 2024Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysiscited by 0
- 2025A Use-Case Specific Dataset for Measuring Dimensions of Responsible Performance in LLM-generated Textcited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Studycited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Study16 Dec 2025
- 2025A Use-Case Specific Dataset for Measuring Dimensions of Responsible Performance in LLM-generated Text23 Oct 2025
- 2025LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation9 Jul 2025
- 2025Just as Humans Need Vaccines, So Do Models: Model Immunization to Combat Falsehoods23 May 2025
- 2025HumaniBench: A Human-Centric Framework for Large Multimodal Models Evaluation16 May 2025
- 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arena4 Jan 2025
- 2024Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis2 Jul 2024
- 2024Fairness and Bias in Multimodal AI: A Survey27 Jun 2024
- 2024Leveraging Multi-AI Agents for Cross-Domain Knowledge Discovery12 Apr 2024