mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Early alignment in two-layer networks training is a two-edged sword

arXiv 2401.10791 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training neural networks with first order optimisation methods is at the core of the empirical success of deep learning. The scale of initialisation is a crucial factor, as small initialisations are generally associated to a feature learning regime, for which gradient descent is implicitly biased towards simple solutions. This work provides a general and quantitative description of the early alignment phase, originally introduced by Maennel et al. (2018). For small initialisation and one hidden ReLU layer networks, the early stage of the training dynamics leads to an alignment of the neurons towards key directions. This alignment induces a sparse representation of the network, which is directly related to the implicit bias of gradient flow at convergence. This sparsity inducing alignment however comes at the expense of difficulties in minimising the training objective: we also provide a simple data example for which overparameterised networks fail to converge towards global minima and only converge to a spurious stationary point instead.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2025An overview of condensation phenomenon in deep learningcited by 17
  2. 2025Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics Explains A Simplicity Bias Across Neural Network Architecturescited by 15
  3. 2025A Theoretical Framework for Grokking: Interpolation followed by Riemannian Norm Minimisationcited by 13
  4. 2024Simplicity Bias of Two-Layer Networks beyond Linearly Separable Datacited by 11
  5. 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regressioncited by 11
  6. 2024Simplicity bias and optimization threshold in two-layer ReLU networkscited by 11
  7. 2024Loss Landscape of Shallow ReLU-like Neural Networks: Stationary Points, Saddle Escape, and Network Embeddingcited by 6
  8. 2024Topological obstruction to the training of shallow ReLU neural networkscited by 6
  9. 2024Can Implicit Bias Imply Adversarial Robustness?cited by 5
  10. 2024When Are Bias-Free ReLU Networks Effectively Linear Networks?cited by 4
  11. 2025Saddle-To-Saddle Dynamics in Deep ReLU Networks: Low-Rank Bias in the First Saddle Escapecited by 4
  12. 2024Spring-block theory of feature learning in deep neural networkscited by 2
6 more
  1. 2025Convergence of Shallow ReLU Networks on Weakly Interacting Datacited by 2
  2. 2025Neural Collapse under Gradient Flow on Shallow ReLU Networks for Orthogonally Separable Datacited by 2
  3. 2025Favorability of Loss Landscape with Weight Decay Requires Both Large Overparametrization and Initializationcited by 1
  4. 2026Large Spikes in Stochastic Gradient Descent: A Large-Deviations Viewcited by 1
  5. 2026Over-Alignment vs Over-Fitting: The Role of Feature Learning Strength in Generalizationcited by 0
  6. 2026Weight Decay and Neuron Condensation: A Three-Stage Analysis of Two-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 0