mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative Dense Retrieval: Memory Can Be a Burden

arXiv 2401.10487 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2024cs.IR cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Retrieval (GR), autoregressively decoding relevant document identifiers given a query, has been shown to perform well under the setting of small-scale corpora. By memorizing the document corpus with model parameters, GR implicitly achieves deep interaction between query and document. However, such a memorizing mechanism faces three drawbacks: (1) Poor memory accuracy for fine-grained features of documents; (2) Memory confusion gets worse as the corpus size increases; (3) Huge memory update costs for new documents. To alleviate these problems, we propose the Generative Dense Retrieval (GDR) paradigm. Specifically, GDR first uses the limited memory volume to achieve inter-cluster matching from query to relevant document clusters. Memorizing-free matching mechanism from Dense Retrieval (DR) is then introduced to conduct fine-grained intra-cluster matching from clusters to relevant documents. The coarse-to-fine process maximizes the advantages of GR's deep interaction and DR's scalability. Besides, we design a cluster identifier constructing strategy to facilitate corpus memory and a cluster-adaptive negative sampling strategy to enhance the intra-cluster mapping ability. Empirical results show that GDR obtains an average of 3.0 R@100 improvement on NQ dataset under multiple settings and has better scalability.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.

Builds on

20 of 25 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  4. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  5. 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 333
  6. 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 242
  7. 2019ERNIE 2.0: A Continual Pre-training Framework for Language Understandingcited by 230
  8. 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 228
  9. 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
  10. 2017A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 162
  11. 2022Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 136
  12. 2022Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifierscited by 112
8 more
  1. 2022A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrievalcited by 107
  2. 2021Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for dense text retrievalcited by 82
  3. 2016Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search on High Dimensional Data --- Experiments, Analyses, and Improvement (v1.0)cited by 44
  4. 2022Multi-View Document Representation Learning for Open-Domain Dense Retrievalcited by 41
  5. 2022DSI++: Updating Transformer Memory with New Documentscited by 35
  6. 2022Ultron: An Ultimate Retriever on Corpus with a Model-based Indexercited by 30
  7. 2020RikiNet: Reading Wikipedia Pages for Natural Question Answeringcited by 21
  8. 2022Learning Diverse Document Representations with Deep Query Interactions for Dense Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

11 papers.