Generative Dense Retrieval: Memory Can Be a Burden
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Retrieval (GR), autoregressively decoding relevant document identifiers given a query, has been shown to perform well under the setting of small-scale corpora. By memorizing the document corpus with model parameters, GR implicitly achieves deep interaction between query and document. However, such a memorizing mechanism faces three drawbacks: (1) Poor memory accuracy for fine-grained features of documents; (2) Memory confusion gets worse as the corpus size increases; (3) Huge memory update costs for new documents. To alleviate these problems, we propose the Generative Dense Retrieval (GDR) paradigm. Specifically, GDR first uses the limited memory volume to achieve inter-cluster matching from query to relevant document clusters. Memorizing-free matching mechanism from Dense Retrieval (DR) is then introduced to conduct fine-grained intra-cluster matching from clusters to relevant documents. The coarse-to-fine process maximizes the advantages of GR's deep interaction and DR's scalability. Besides, we design a cluster identifier constructing strategy to facilitate corpus memory and a cluster-adaptive negative sampling strategy to enhance the intra-cluster mapping ability. Empirical results show that GDR obtains an average of 3.0 R@100 improvement on NQ dataset under multiple settings and has better scalability.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.
Builds on
20 of 25 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 333
- 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 242
- 2019ERNIE 2.0: A Continual Pre-training Framework for Language Understandingcited by 230
- 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 228
- 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
- 2017A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 162
- 2022Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 136
- 2022Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifierscited by 112
8 more
- 2022A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrievalcited by 107
- 2021Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for dense text retrievalcited by 82
- 2016Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search on High Dimensional Data --- Experiments, Analyses, and Improvement (v1.0)cited by 44
- 2022Multi-View Document Representation Learning for Open-Domain Dense Retrievalcited by 41
- 2022DSI++: Updating Transformer Memory with New Documentscited by 35
- 2022Ultron: An Ultimate Retriever on Corpus with a Model-based Indexercited by 30
- 2020RikiNet: Reading Wikipedia Pages for Natural Question Answeringcited by 21
- 2022Learning Diverse Document Representations with Deep Query Interactions for Dense Retrievalcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Memory OS of AI Agentcited by 140
- 2024From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrievalcited by 89
- 2024Generative Retrieval with Preference Optimization for E-commerce Searchcited by 9
- 2024Generative Retrieval as Multi-Vector Dense Retrievalcited by 8
- 2024Focused Large Language Models are Stable Many-Shot Learnerscited by 8
- 2024Breaking the Hourglass Phenomenon of Residual Quantization: Enhancing the Upper Bound of Generative Retrievalcited by 7
- 2024Self-Retrieval: End-to-End Information Retrieval with One Large Language Modelcited by 4
- 2024Poor-Supervised Evaluation for SuperLLM via Mutual Consistencycited by 1
- 2026Autoregressive Ranking: Bridging the Gap Between Dual and Cross Encoderscited by 1
- 2026Multimodal Generative Retrieval Model with Staged Pretraining for Food Delivery on Meituancited by 0
- 2026Preference Shapes Relevance: Cross-component Hierarchical Semantic Alignment for Personalized Generative Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Preference Shapes Relevance: Cross-component Hierarchical Semantic Alignment for Personalized Generative Retrieval31 Aug 2026
- 2026Multimodal Generative Retrieval Model with Staged Pretraining for Food Delivery on Meituan6 Feb 2026
- 2026Autoregressive Ranking: Bridging the Gap Between Dual and Cross Encoders9 Jan 2026
- 2025Memory OS of AI Agent30 May 2025
- 2024Focused Large Language Models are Stable Many-Shot Learners26 Aug 2024
- 2024Poor-Supervised Evaluation for SuperLLM via Mutual Consistency25 Aug 2024
- 2024Breaking the Hourglass Phenomenon of Residual Quantization: Enhancing the Upper Bound of Generative Retrieval31 Jul 2024
- 2024Generative Retrieval with Preference Optimization for E-commerce Search29 Jul 2024
- 2024From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval23 Apr 2024
- 2024Generative Retrieval as Multi-Vector Dense Retrieval31 Mar 2024
- 2024Self-Retrieval: End-to-End Information Retrieval with One Large Language Model23 Feb 2024