mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing and Mitigating Bias for Vulnerable Classes: Towards Balanced Representation in Dataset

arXiv 2401.10397 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The accuracy and fairness of perception systems in autonomous driving are essential, especially for vulnerable road users such as cyclists, pedestrians, and motorcyclists who face significant risks in urban driving environments. While mainstream research primarily enhances class performance metrics, the hidden traits of bias inheritance in the AI models, class imbalances and disparities within the datasets are often overlooked. Our research addresses these issues by investigating class imbalances among vulnerable road users, with a focus on analyzing class distribution, evaluating performance, and assessing bias impact. Utilizing popular CNN models and Vision Transformers (ViTs) with the nuScenes dataset, our performance evaluation indicates detection disparities for underrepresented classes. Compared to related work, we focus on metric-specific and Cost-Sensitive learning for model optimization and bias mitigation, which includes data augmentation and resampling. Using the proposed mitigation approaches, we see improvement in IoU(%) and NDS(%) metrics from 71.3 to 75.6 and 80.6 to 83.7 for the CNN model. Similarly, for ViT, we observe improvement in IoU and NDS metrics from 74.9 to 79.2 and 83.8 to 87.1. This research contributes to developing reliable models while enhancing inclusiveness for minority classes in datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.

Builds on

22 of 63 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  4. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  5. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  6. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  7. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  8. 2019Imbalance Problems in Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 118
  9. 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
  10. 2021Fog Simulation on Real LiDAR Point Clouds for 3D Object Detection in Adverse Weathercited by 95
  11. 2021Influence-Balanced Loss for Imbalanced Visual Classificationcited by 91
  12. 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
10 more
  1. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  2. 2022Fully Sparse 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
  3. 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
  4. 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
  5. 2021Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learningcited by 17
  6. 2023A Survey on Approximate Edge AI for Energy Efficient Autonomous Driving Servicescited by 14
  7. 2022A Quality Index Metric and Method for Online Self-Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles Sensory Perceptioncited by 10
  8. 2023Fairness-enhancing deep learning for ride-hailing demand predictioncited by 9
  9. 2018Learning Structure and Strength of CNN Filters for Small Sample Size Trainingcited by 8
  10. 2022Learning an Interpretable Model for Driver Behavior Prediction with Inductive Biasescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.