mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bridging Research and Readers: A Multi-Modal Automated Academic Papers Interpretation System

arXiv 2401.09150 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the contemporary information era, significantly accelerated by the advent of Large-scale Language Models, the proliferation of scientific literature is reaching unprecedented levels. Researchers urgently require efficient tools for reading and summarizing academic papers, uncovering significant scientific literature, and employing diverse interpretative methodologies. To address this burgeoning demand, the role of automated scientific literature interpretation systems has become paramount. However, prevailing models, both commercial and open-source, confront notable challenges: they often overlook multimodal data, grapple with summarizing over-length texts, and lack diverse user interfaces. In response, we introduce an open-source multi-modal automated academic paper interpretation system (MMAPIS) with three-step process stages, incorporating LLMs to augment its functionality. Our system first employs the hybrid modality preprocessing and alignment module to extract plain text, and tables or figures from documents separately. It then aligns this information based on the section names they belong to, ensuring that data with identical section names are categorized under the same section. Following this, we introduce a hierarchical discourse-aware summarization method. It utilizes the extracted section names to divide the article into shorter text segments, facilitating specific summarizations both within and between sections via LLMs with specific prompts. Finally, we have designed four types of diversified user interfaces, including paper recommendation, multimodal Q&A, audio broadcasting, and interpretation blog, which can be widely applied across various scenarios. Our qualitative and quantitative evaluations underscore the system's superiority, especially in scientific summarization, where it outperforms solutions relying solely on GPT-4.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2024.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  5. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  6. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  7. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  8. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
  9. 2023Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documentscited by 240
  10. 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
  11. 2018Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarizationcited by 177
  12. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
8 more
  1. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  2. 2020CTRLsum: Towards Generic Controllable Text Summarizationcited by 98
  3. 2022An Empirical Survey on Long Document Summarization: Datasets, Models and Metricscited by 74
  4. 2018The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evaluationcited by 60
  5. 2023From Sparse to Dense: GPT-4 Summarization with Chain of Density Promptingcited by 52
  6. 2021D2S: Document-to-Slide Generation Via Query-Based Text Summarizationcited by 48
  7. 2021Bringing Structure into Summaries: a Faceted Summarization Dataset for Long Scientific Documentscited by 33
  8. 2021Controllable Abstractive Dialogue Summarization with Sketch Supervisioncited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.