mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Large Language Models are Null-Shot Learners

arXiv 2401.08273 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents null-shot prompting. Null-shot prompting exploits hallucination in large language models (LLMs) by instructing LLMs to utilize information from the "Examples" section that never exists within the provided context to perform a task. While reducing hallucination is crucial and non-negligible for daily and critical uses of LLMs, we propose that in the current landscape in which these LLMs still hallucinate, it is possible, in fact, to exploit hallucination to increase performance in performing tasks compared to standard zero-shot prompting. Experiments with eight LLMs show improvements in performance across the majority of eight datasets, including reading comprehension, arithmetic reasoning, and closed-book question answering. The observed inconsistency in increased relative performance across the LLMs also potentially indicates a different degree of inherent hallucination in each model. These differences show that it is possible to utilize null-shot prompting as a way to detect degrees of hallucination in LLMs using existing benchmarking datasets. We also perform ablation studies, including experimenting with a modified version of null-shot prompting that incorporates ideas from zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting, which shows different trends of results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.

Builds on

26 of 47 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  9. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  10. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  11. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  12. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
14 more
  1. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  2. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  3. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
  4. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  5. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  6. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  7. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  8. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
  9. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 372
  10. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
  11. 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 213
  12. 2023Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 180
  13. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
  14. 2023Everything of Thoughts: Defying the Law of Penrose Triangle for Thought Generationcited by 73

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Investigating the Role of Prompting and External Tools in Hallucination Rates of Large Language Models
  2. 2025Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models
  3. 2025Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation
  4. 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting
  5. 2025OnionEval: An Unified Evaluation of Fact-conflicting Hallucination for Small-Large Language Models
  6. 2025HAVE: Head-Adaptive Gating and ValuE Calibration for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models
  7. 2023Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models
  8. 2025Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models