mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An approach for mistranslation removal from popular dataset for Indic MT Task

arXiv 2401.06398 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The conversion of content from one language to another utilizing a computer system is known as Machine Translation (MT). Various techniques have come up to ensure effective translations that retain the contextual and lexical interpretation of the source language. End-to-end Neural Machine Translation (NMT) is a popular technique and it is now widely used in real-world MT systems. Massive amounts of parallel datasets (sentences in one language alongside translations in another) are required for MT systems. These datasets are crucial for an MT system to learn linguistic structures and patterns of both languages during the training phase. One such dataset is Samanantar, the largest publicly accessible parallel dataset for Indian languages (ILs). Since the corpus has been gathered from various sources, it contains many incorrect translations. Hence, the MT systems built using this dataset cannot perform to their usual potential. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to remove mistranslations from the training corpus and evaluate its performance and efficiency. Two Indic languages (ILs), namely, Hindi (HIN) and Odia (ODI) are chosen for the experiment. A baseline NMT system is built for these two ILs, and the effect of different dataset sizes is also investigated. The quality of the translations in the experiment is evaluated using standard metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, and RIBES. From the results, it is observed that removing the incorrect translation from the dataset makes the translation quality better. It is also noticed that, despite the fact that the ILs-English and English-ILs systems are trained using the same corpus, ILs-English works more effectively across all the evaluation metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2024.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  5. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  6. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  7. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  8. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  9. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  10. 2021Self-Training Sampling with Monolingual Data Uncertainty for Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
  11. 2022Improving Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System for Indic Languagescited by 6
  12. 2023Statistical Machine Translation for Indic Languagescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.