Tree Search-Based Evolutionary Bandits for Protein Sequence Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While modern biotechnologies allow synthesizing new proteins and function measurements at scale, efficiently exploring a protein sequence space and engineering it remains a daunting task due to the vast sequence space of any given protein. Protein engineering is typically conducted through an iterative process of adding mutations to the wild-type or lead sequences, recombination of mutations, and running new rounds of screening. To enhance the efficiency of such a process, we propose a tree search-based bandit learning method, which expands a tree starting from the initial sequence with the guidance of a bandit machine learning model. Under simplified assumptions and a Gaussian Process prior, we provide theoretical analysis and a Bayesian regret bound, demonstrating that the combination of local search and bandit learning method can efficiently discover a near-optimal design. The full algorithm is compatible with a suite of randomized tree search heuristics, machine learning models, pre-trained embeddings, and bandit techniques. We test various instances of the algorithm across benchmark protein datasets using simulated screens. Experiment results demonstrate that the algorithm is both sample-efficient and able to find top designs using reasonably small mutation counts.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.
Builds on
17 of 53 references.
References · 17
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
- 2019Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPEcited by 229
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 199
- 2022ProGen2: Exploring the Boundaries of Protein Language Modelscited by 156
- 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
- 2019Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust designcited by 110
- 2022Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoderscited by 99
- 2020Neural Contextual Bandits with Deep Representation and Shallow Explorationcited by 71
- 2020AdaLead: A simple and robust adaptive greedy search algorithm for sequence designcited by 63
- 2020High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Banditscited by 61
5 more
- 2020Autofocused oracles for model-based designcited by 50
- 2018Design by adaptive samplingcited by 31
- 2022Communication Efficient Distributed Learning for Kernelized Contextual Banditscited by 15
- 2019Rarely-switching linear bandits: optimization of causal effects for the real worldcited by 3
- 2022Bandit Theory and Thompson Sampling-Guided Directed Evolution for Sequence Optimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.