mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bounds on the price of feedback for mistake-bounded online learning

arXiv 2401.05794 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.DM math.COcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We improve several worst-case bounds for various online learning scenarios from (Auer and Long, Machine Learning, 1999). In particular, we sharpen an upper bound for delayed ambiguous reinforcement learning by a factor of 2 and an upper bound for learning compositions of families of functions by a factor of 2.41. We also improve a lower bound from the same paper for learning compositions of k families of functions by a factor of Theta(lnk), matching the upper bound up to a constant factor. In addition, we solve a problem from (Long, Theoretical Computer Science, 2020) on the price of bandit feedback with respect to standard feedback for multiclass learning, and we improve an upper bound from (Feng et al., Theoretical Computer Science, 2023) on the price of r-input delayed ambiguous reinforcement learning by a factor of r, matching a lower bound from the same paper up to the leading term.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2024.

Builds on

6 of 29 references.

References · 6

  1. 2013The price of bandit information in multiclass online classificationcited by 24
  2. 2023Optimal Prediction Using Expert Advice and Randomized Littlestone Dimensioncited by 18
  3. 2021A note on the price of bandit feedback for mistake-bounded online learningcited by 9
  4. 2020Near-tight closure bounds for Littlestone and threshold dimensionscited by 7
  5. 2022Sharp bounds on the price of bandit feedback for several models of mistake-bounded online learningcited by 4
  6. 2023Online Learning of Smooth Functionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.