mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining the Power of Topological Data Analysis in Graph Machine Learning

arXiv 2401.04250 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Topological Data Analysis (TDA) has been praised by researchers for its ability to capture intricate shapes and structures within data. TDA is considered robust in handling noisy and high-dimensional datasets, and its interpretability is believed to promote an intuitive understanding of model behavior. However, claims regarding the power and usefulness of TDA have only been partially tested in application domains where TDA-based models are compared to other graph machine learning approaches, such as graph neural networks. We meticulously test claims on TDA through a comprehensive set of experiments and validate their merits. Our results affirm TDA's robustness against outliers and its interpretability, aligning with proponents' arguments. However, we find that TDA does not significantly enhance the predictive power of existing methods in our specific experiments, while incurring significant computational costs. We investigate phenomena related to graph characteristics, such as small diameters and high clustering coefficients, to mitigate the computational expenses of TDA computations. Our results offer valuable perspectives on integrating TDA into graph machine learning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.

Builds on

24 of 66 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  4. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
  5. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 718
  6. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks for Graph Datacited by 395
  7. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  8. 2019A Survey on Graph Kernelscited by 148
  9. 2015A roadmap for the computation of persistent homologycited by 126
  10. 2019Ripser: efficient computation of Vietoris-Rips persistence barcodescited by 115
  11. 2017Deep Learning with Topological Signaturescited by 113
  12. 2019Learning metrics for persistence-based summaries and applications for graph classificationcited by 57
12 more
  1. 2013Stochastic Convergence of Persistence Landscapes and Silhouettescited by 43
  2. 2019Graph Kernels: A Surveycited by 43
  3. 2020Convolutional Kernel Networks for Graph-Structured Datacited by 38
  4. 2016Beyond Deep Residual Learning for Image Restoration: Persistent Homology-Guided Manifold Simplificationcited by 22
  5. 2022RipsNet: a general architecture for fast and robust estimation of the persistent homology of point cloudscited by 20
  6. 2015Approximated and User Steerable tSNE for Progressive Visual Analyticscited by 19
  7. 2021The Power of the Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm for Machine Learning with Graphscited by 19
  8. 2023Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learningcited by 19
  9. 2014Using persistent homology and dynamical distances to analyze protein bindingcited by 15
  10. 2021Graph Kernel Neural Networkscited by 13
  11. 2019Harnessing the power of Topological Data Analysis to detect change points in time seriescited by 5
  12. 2022Reduction Algorithms for Persistence Diagrams of Networks: CoralTDA and PrunITcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.