XXAI: Towards eXplicitly eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There are concerns about the reliability and safety of artificial intelligence (AI) based on sub-symbolic neural networks because its decisions cannot be explained explicitly. This is the black box problem of modern AI. At the same time, symbolic AI has the nature of a white box and is able to ensure the reliability and safety of its decisions. However, several problems prevent the widespread use of symbolic AI: the opacity of mathematical models and natural language terms, the lack of a unified ontology, and the combinatorial explosion of search capabilities. To solve the black-box problem of AI, we propose eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI) - a fully transparent white-box AI based on deterministic logical cellular automata whose rules are derived from the first principles of the general theory of the relevant domain. In this case, the general theory of the domain plays the role of a knowledge base for deriving the inferences of the cellular automata. A cellular automaton implements parallel multi-level logical inference at all levels of organization - from local interactions of the element base to the system as a whole. Our verification of several ecological hypotheses sets a precedent for the successful implementation of the proposed solution. XXAI is able to automatically verify the reliability, security and ethics of sub-symbolic neural network solutions in both the final and training phases. In this article, we present precedents for the successful implementation of XXAI, the theoretical and methodological foundations for its further development, and discuss prospects for the future.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2024.
Builds on
10 of 82 references.
References · 10
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
- 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 125
- 2021GLocalX -- From Local to Global Explanations of Black Box AI Modelscited by 48
- 2023Efficient RLHF: Reducing the Memory Usage of PPOcited by 40
- 2021EXplainable Neural-Symbolic Learning (X-NeSyL) methodology to fuse deep learning representations with expert knowledge graphs: the MonuMAI cultural heritage use casecited by 30
- 2021High-dimensional separability for one- and few-shot learningcited by 11
- 2023From Conceptual Spaces to Quantum Concepts: Formalising and Learning Structured Conceptual Modelscited by 3
- 2023A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.