DEM: A Method for Certifying Deep Neural Network Classifier Outputs in Aerospace
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Software development in the aerospace domain requires adhering to strict, high-quality standards. While there exist regulatory guidelines for commercial software in this domain (e.g., ARP-4754 and DO-178), these do not apply to software with deep neural network (DNN) components. Consequently, it is unclear how to allow aerospace systems to benefit from the deep learning revolution. Our work here seeks to address this challenge with a novel, output-centric approach for DNN certification. Our method employs statistical verification techniques, and has the key advantage of being able to flag specific inputs for which the DNN's output may be unreliable - so that they may be later inspected by a human expert. To achieve this, our method conducts a statistical analysis of the DNN's predictions for other, nearby inputs, in order to detect inconsistencies. This is in contrast to existing techniques, which typically attempt to certify the entire DNN, as opposed to individual outputs. Our method uses the DNN as a black-box, and makes no assumptions about its topology. We hope that this work constitutes another step towards integrating DNNs in safety-critical applications - especially in the aerospace domain, where high standards of quality and reliability are crucial.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2024.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
- 2016Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraintscited by 90
- 2018A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 54
- 2020An SMT-Based Approach for Verifying Binarized Neural Networkscited by 47
- 2022The Third International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2022): Summary and Resultscited by 39
8 more
- 2019Robustness of Neural Networks: A Probabilistic and Practical Approachcited by 38
- 2022PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbationscited by 19
- 2021RoMA: a Method for Neural Network Robustness Measurement and Assessmentcited by 10
- 2022Toward Certification of Machine-Learning Systems for Low Criticality Airborne Applicationscited by 6
- 2023Framework for Certification of AI-Based Systemscited by 3
- 2022AnoMili: Spoofing Prevention and Explainable Anomaly Detection for the 1553 Military Avionic Buscited by 2
- 2023Enhancing Deep Learning with Scenario-Based Override Rules: a Case Studycited by 2
- 2023Runway Sign Classifier: A DAL C Certifiable Machine Learning Systemcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.