FairGridSearch: A Framework to Compare Fairness-Enhancing Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models are increasingly used in critical decision-making applications. However, these models are susceptible to replicating or even amplifying bias present in real-world data. While there are various bias mitigation methods and base estimators in the literature, selecting the optimal model for a specific application remains challenging. This paper focuses on binary classification and proposes FairGridSearch, a novel framework for comparing fairness-enhancing models. FairGridSearch enables experimentation with different model parameter combinations and recommends the best one. The study applies FairGridSearch to three popular datasets (Adult, COMPAS, and German Credit) and analyzes the impacts of metric selection, base estimator choice, and classification threshold on model fairness. The results highlight the significance of selecting appropriate accuracy and fairness metrics for model evaluation. Additionally, different base estimators and classification threshold values affect the effectiveness of bias mitigation methods and fairness stability respectively, but the effects are not consistent across all datasets. Based on these findings, future research on fairness in machine learning should consider a broader range of factors when building fair models, going beyond bias mitigation methods alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2024.
Builds on
20 of 41 references.
References · 20
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
8 more
- 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
- 2022A Systematic Study of Bias Amplificationcited by 65
- 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
- 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
- 2022Good Classification Measures and How to Find Themcited by 11
- 2022Tackling Algorithmic Disability Discrimination in the Hiring Process: An Ethical, Legal and Technical Analysiscited by 9
- 2022Equalizing Credit Opportunity in Algorithms: Aligning Algorithmic Fairness Research with U.S. Fair Lending Regulationcited by 9
- 2022Cascaded Debiasing: Studying the Cumulative Effect of Multiple Fairness-Enhancing Interventionscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.