mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Two-Stage Surrogate Modeling for Data-Driven Design Optimization with Application to Composite Microstructure Generation

arXiv 2401.02008 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.CEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a novel two-stage machine learning-based surrogate modeling framework to address inverse problems in scientific and engineering fields. In the first stage of the proposed framework, a machine learning model termed the "learner" identifies a limited set of candidates within the input design space whose predicted outputs closely align with desired outcomes. Subsequently, in the second stage, a separate surrogate model, functioning as an "evaluator," is employed to assess the reduced candidate space generated in the first stage. This evaluation process eliminates inaccurate and uncertain solutions, guided by a user-defined coverage level. The framework's distinctive contribution is the integration of conformal inference, providing a versatile and efficient approach that can be widely applicable. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework compared to conventional single-stage inverse problems, we conduct several benchmark tests and investigate an engineering application focused on the micromechanical modeling of fiber-reinforced composites. The results affirm the superiority of our proposed framework, as it consistently produces more reliable solutions. Therefore, the introduced framework offers a unique perspective on fostering interactions between machine learning-based surrogate models in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2024.

Builds on

21 of 82 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  2. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 511
  3. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 348
  4. 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 307
  5. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
  6. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 151
  7. 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
  8. 2022Conformal Inference for Online Prediction with Arbitrary Distribution Shiftscited by 123
  9. 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
  10. 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
  11. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 75
  12. 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
9 more
  1. 2022Training Uncertainty-Aware Classifiers with Conformalized Deep Learningcited by 62
  2. 2020Solving inverse problems using conditional invertible neural networkscited by 37
  3. 2020Polymer Informatics: Current Status and Critical Next Stepscited by 29
  4. 2022Bayesian operator inference for data-driven reduced-order modelingcited by 19
  5. 2023Data-Driven Design for Metamaterials and Multiscale Systems: A Reviewcited by 17
  6. 2021Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspectivecited by 7
  7. 2023Efficient Surrogate Models for Materials Science Simulations: Machine Learning-based Prediction of Microstructure Propertiescited by 6
  8. 2020Kernel Ridge Regression Using Importance Sampling with Application to Seismic Response Predictioncited by 2
  9. 2016A Randomized Approach to Efficient Kernel Clusteringcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.