mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Downstream Task-Oriented Generative Model Selections on Synthetic Data Training for Fraud Detection Models

arXiv 2401.00974 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Devising procedures for downstream task-oriented generative model selections is an unresolved problem of practical importance. Existing studies focused on the utility of a single family of generative models. They provided limited insights on how synthetic data practitioners select the best family generative models for synthetic training tasks given a specific combination of machine learning model class and performance metric. In this paper, we approach the downstream task-oriented generative model selections problem in the case of training fraud detection models and investigate the best practice given different combinations of model interpretability and model performance constraints. Our investigation supports that, while both Neural Network(NN)-based and Bayesian Network(BN)-based generative models are both good to complete synthetic training task under loose model interpretability constrain, the BN-based generative models is better than NN-based when synthetic training fraud detection model under strict model interpretability constrain. Our results provides practical guidance for machine learning practitioner who is interested in replacing their training dataset from real to synthetic, and shed lights on more general downstream task-oriented generative model selection problems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2024.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  3. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
  4. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  5. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
  6. 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
  7. 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 185
  8. 2020Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Daycited by 108
  9. 2018Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
  10. 2021Synthetic Data Generation for Fraud Detection using GANscited by 7
  11. 2022Enabling Synthetic Data adoption in regulated domainscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.